{"id":"W2044329456","doi":"10.1139/p09-095","title":"Exploring the nature of Pacific climate variability using a “toy” nonlinear stochastic model","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Physics","topic":"Climate variability and models","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"BC Hydro (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Physics; Statistical physics; Nonlinear system; Pacific decadal oscillation; Series (stratigraphy); De facto; Oscillation (cell signaling); Climate system; Climatology; Climate change; Meteorology; Quantum mechanics; Oceanography; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005104236,0.0003025929,0.0003854567,0.0003038846,0.0004750406,0.0009553087,0.0008318119,0.001084934,0.001094125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002490791,0.0002297504,0.0005098782,0.0004114488,0.0009549109,0.001100176,0.0007568297,0.0007427977,0.00008531265],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008476893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008401601,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02688019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01118105,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998828,0.0000572021,0.000004736125,0.0000232114,0.00001536238,0.00001666725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992717,0.0004965264,0.00008539799,0.00003907222,0.00004471849,0.00006269068],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005857445,0.00002344794,0.003235757,0.00003873078,0.00002544799,0.0001378032,0.000109054,0.9330067,0.0009514883,0.06096079,0.0003380978,0.001114111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009106269,0.000006573114,0.0003831125,0.0000018934,0.000004742571,0.000009728479,0.00001417055,0.9923798,0.00002886177,0.007064244,0.00009295502,0.000004791204],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8553379,0.0003126531,0.1216014,0.003093671,0.00005310836,0.00003774054,0.0005533119,0.0001788753,0.01883142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938241,0.0001642583,0.004295453,0.00005947289,0.00002508705,0.00002606313,0.0001157337,0.00001432212,0.001475413],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02688019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05344748,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05664943102019036,"score_gpt":0.2470794496891103,"score_spread":0.19043001866892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}