{"id":"W2044385827","doi":"10.1016/j.patrec.2004.08.008","title":"Efficient Hodge–Helmholtz decomposition of motion fields","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pattern Recognition Letters","topic":"Advanced Vision and Imaging","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Helmholtz free energy; Curl (programming language); Remainder; Component (thermodynamics); Helmholtz equation; Decomposition; Divergence (linguistics); Finite element method; Field (mathematics); Computer science; Mathematics; Algorithm; Mathematical analysis; Pure mathematics; Physics; Arithmetic; Boundary value problem","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001219642,0.0001121928,0.0001174779,0.0001587942,0.00007565053,0.00004599058,0.0002255212,0.00003584102,0.00003676707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000155253,0.0001145051,0.00007902203,0.0002050961,0.00003488699,0.0002315811,0.00006494182,0.0001166966,0.0001464978],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005388935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009549542,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002083334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001997558,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990129,0.00004289752,0.0002524298,0.0002788771,0.0002244493,0.0001884248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999464,0.00003533723,0.0001343606,0.0002364521,0.00007057822,0.00005922077],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007053128,0.000166975,0.0004698762,0.00003273623,0.00001210124,0.00001854351,0.0006329663,0.01169184,0.05245971,0.00008413733,0.0001771783,0.9342469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007040955,0.0004379038,0.03326812,0.0012112,0.00005778102,0.0002548203,0.0001865487,0.347047,0.5961009,0.01225743,0.0004762248,0.001661213],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2796854,0.00001048101,0.7157795,0.003839709,0.0003719365,0.00009550031,0.000003265778,0.00008138327,0.0001328672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9461825,0.00000484759,0.04833605,0.005383328,0.00005306635,0.00001042687,0.00001939529,0.000007842444,0.000002554746],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9325857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4669382,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01706653982205517,"score_gpt":0.2701610562063776,"score_spread":0.2530945163843224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}