{"id":"W2044520686","doi":"10.1136/ip.2004.005280","title":"How low can they go? Potential for reduction in work injury rates","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Injury Prevention","topic":"Occupational Health and Safety Research","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Hamilton Health Sciences; Institute for Work & Health","funders":"","keywords":"Percentile; Occupational safety and health; Work (physics); Occupational injury; Injury prevention; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Distribution (mathematics); Benchmark (surveying); Actuarial science; Suicide prevention; Business; Medicine; Operations management; Forensic engineering; Environmental health; Statistics; Engineering; Mathematics; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00478331,0.0003691968,0.000665194,0.001156099,0.001121838,0.002297749,0.0020526,0.002082304,0.009735635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02961841,0.0001456901,0.0006033332,0.0008568444,0.001215837,0.001643638,0.00113728,0.001672306,0.002145284],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004084001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00585408,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04640487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07437205,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959083,0.001364788,0.0001185948,0.000297101,0.001247203,0.001064057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910412,0.002339237,0.002017924,0.0003684519,0.002085422,0.002147634],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000617762,0.001446715,0.4965295,0.001198875,0.0003272849,0.0005284043,0.001740087,0.0032608,0.001407728,0.01127043,0.059308,0.4223644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002690293,0.002400026,0.8292669,0.002669958,0.0007153667,0.001093021,0.008559325,0.005652337,0.002298521,0.06401134,0.0829373,0.0001268963],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5126255,0.02075551,0.01094918,0.3444493,0.001092667,0.000261671,0.002265102,0.0008647097,0.1067365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831699,0.00271389,0.002672183,0.006252579,0.0001896358,0.000099628,0.0003507986,0.00003320922,0.004518125],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04640487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09226954,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05315362610501977,"score_gpt":0.4634767302906252,"score_spread":0.4103231041856055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}