{"id":"W2044527783","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0025609","title":"Assessing the Value of Recreational Divers for Censusing Elasmobranchs","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Ichthyology and Marine Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Recreation; Range (aeronautics); Abundance (ecology); Geography; Fishery; Temporal scales; Sampling (signal processing); Population; Scale (ratio); Data collection; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Biology; Cartography; Environmental science; Computer science; Statistics; Demography; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004874858,0.0003003814,0.0001915166,0.001101928,0.0005957397,0.0008557045,0.0006087721,0.000453646,0.001165077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01581872,0.000131927,0.0002262149,0.0008058667,0.0005878575,0.001037402,0.0009009363,0.0002802233,0.0002444716],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006627934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001016036,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006506529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02366558,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969145,0.002016358,0.0001825625,0.0002496814,0.0004923457,0.000144523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854869,0.006701504,0.00333119,0.000853839,0.002650854,0.0009757789],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001435975,0.00008105967,0.9724769,0.000111677,0.00003357794,0.0001591148,0.001258377,0.0008316452,0.0009362408,0.00004681541,0.0001678297,0.02375318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000142323,0.001508349,0.9699041,0.0002781991,0.000087919,0.0004676698,0.01703372,0.006537106,0.002117218,0.0002651313,0.001746172,0.00004026538],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974947,0.00008007209,0.001036232,0.00008177652,0.000003966894,0.00005054058,0.0001868035,0.00001262538,0.00105343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955676,0.0001224318,0.003708968,0.00002560149,0.000004712769,0.00007023916,0.0002381296,0.000002678924,0.0002595168],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006506529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02578104,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08443961994404209,"score_gpt":0.2558597335105711,"score_spread":0.171420113566529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}