{"id":"W2044796948","doi":"10.1108/09615530910922125","title":"Evaluation of confined natural and forced convection predictions by different turbulence models","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat &amp Fluid Flow","topic":"Wind and Air Flow Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Turbulence; Mechanics; Forced convection; Natural convection; Turbulence kinetic energy; Turbulence modeling; Isothermal process; HVAC; K-epsilon turbulence model; K-omega turbulence model; Statistical physics; Thermodynamics; Convection; Physics; Air conditioning","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001151667,0.0001317981,0.0002666044,0.00006555489,0.00007908434,0.00002338302,0.0001850195,0.00005112039,0.0001158708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000485342,0.00009949707,0.0001419084,0.00008397591,0.00009757762,0.0002877637,0.00004015683,0.0001354928,9.762389e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001972032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001773762,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001923726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001412549,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982177,0.0002243669,0.0004762429,0.0001677591,0.0007754279,0.0001384821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990723,0.0002735128,0.0001621295,0.00007409049,0.0003319554,0.00008606038],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004540741,0.0004205786,0.0005840381,0.000008179371,0.0003376457,7.294904e-7,0.0007171449,0.05285385,0.2578308,0.0002225724,0.004608202,0.6819622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001628445,0.0005136917,0.007135199,0.00005427694,0.0001684801,0.00006020274,0.00005041436,0.9648306,0.009626457,0.01381818,0.001971983,0.000142103],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1274228,0.000694378,0.868688,0.001782408,0.0009452882,0.000212867,0.00002536016,0.00001020069,0.0002187171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9024101,0.0001337425,0.09705087,0.0001674565,0.0001457531,0.00001029588,0.000008899127,0.000006476999,0.00006640122],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9119767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4057373,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03518652831855018,"score_gpt":0.3574378877344487,"score_spread":0.3222513594158985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}