{"id":"W2044835764","doi":"10.1063/1.1361080","title":"A nondestructive technique for determining the spring constant of atomic force microscope cantilevers","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Scientific Instruments","topic":"Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council; Girton College, University of Cambridge; Glaucoma Research Society of Canada","keywords":"Cantilever; Spring (device); Wafer; Materials science; Silicon nitride; Electrostatic force microscope; Non-contact atomic force microscopy; Silicon; Optoelectronics; Nondestructive testing; Electrical conductor; Nanotechnology; Atomic force microscopy; Optics; Conductive atomic force microscopy; Composite material; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004482767,0.0001251778,0.0002696774,0.0000548754,0.0002188296,0.00002904947,0.0003590888,0.0000224839,0.00006426063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008326389,0.00009389126,0.0001617217,0.0003247605,0.0003451018,0.00009115804,0.00008508442,0.00007180032,0.000002473033],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003287468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000128221,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006778265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001491276,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989507,0.00001788876,0.0004463175,0.000240444,0.0001349347,0.000209727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989557,0.00002796439,0.0004126841,0.0003830755,0.0001872901,0.00003323158],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002052418,0.0001877657,0.04598318,0.002392641,0.000102204,1.470486e-7,0.0001604716,8.214449e-7,0.7372007,0.04662433,0.0008983513,0.1664289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004114468,0.00005368828,0.0005967198,0.005648782,0.00009736615,0.000002591846,0.00009484428,0.00014728,0.9694746,0.002963515,0.02030191,0.0002073301],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9836922,0.0002362802,0.01100714,0.0000397834,0.0001199932,0.002328607,0.0002278815,0.00001326169,0.002334835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864255,0.0002255604,0.0127993,0.00003004261,0.00001338384,0.000284906,0.00002813429,0.00001292515,0.0001801974],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2322738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3828774,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01423180162444845,"score_gpt":0.2987310641940384,"score_spread":0.28449926256959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}