{"id":"W2045092925","doi":"10.3152/147154603781766310","title":"Social impact assessments of large dams throughout the world: lessons learned over two decades","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Hydropower, Displacement, Environmental Impact","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadiana.org; Bell (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Social impact assessment; China; Three gorges; Visibility; Social impact; Environmental planning; Impact assessment; Perception; Compensation (psychology); Environmental resource management; Environmental impact assessment; Political science; Geography; Environmental science; Sociology; Psychology; Public administration; Engineering; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":{"n_in":1,"stratum":"aff_core","weight":5595.2375,"opus":{"tier":"OUT","genre":"conceptual","about_ca":false,"confidence":"low","reason":"Lessons on social impact assessment methods from large dam projects; the object is regulatory assessment practice rather than scholarly research practice, but the methodological framing puts it near the boundary."},"gpt":{"tier":"T1","genre":"empirical","about_ca":false,"confidence":"medium","reason":"The work draws cross-case lessons about social impact assessment methods, monitoring, alternatives, and ethical practice."},"grok":{"tier":"OUT","genre":"empirical","about_ca":false,"confidence":"high","reason":"Lessons on social impact assessment of large dams; project impact methods, not study of research itself."}},"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01035216,0.0005818856,0.0005180864,0.001938794,0.0007935283,0.001346067,0.0008451866,0.0006092181,0.001733973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01091968,0.0001694972,0.0003508019,0.002351259,0.0009968418,0.00228279,0.001993508,0.0006983315,0.0001203488],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002999223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003435192,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02960682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05833535,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975547,0.001446922,0.0001295439,0.0001648489,0.0005598851,0.0001441122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896317,0.005571885,0.0006312674,0.0003520883,0.003509356,0.0003036838],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001734614,0.0005336321,0.06419389,0.0008875654,0.0001155202,0.0004302998,0.007584915,0.02160734,0.001482523,0.00709988,0.003111618,0.8927793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001752491,0.003664988,0.5214033,0.007155464,0.0003232781,0.0007264967,0.1136251,0.05658365,0.01198473,0.07755378,0.2064208,0.0003831097],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.8962013,0.01937594,0.02146247,0.01545196,0.000239387,0.0004036208,0.0006014816,0.0001024555,0.04616135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9727954,0.01329296,0.01088375,0.0004539777,0.00008128162,0.00009208536,0.0001794001,0.000018329,0.00220277],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02960682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07634707739477758,"score_gpt":0.6271615240078862,"score_spread":0.5508144466131086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}