{"id":"W2045115089","doi":"10.1016/j.psep.2013.11.008","title":"Dynamic approach to risk management: Application to the Hoeganaes metal dust accidents","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","topic":"Risk and Safety Analysis","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Hazard analysis; Risk analysis (engineering); Risk assessment; Hazard; Engineering; Identification (biology); Risk management; Dynamic assessment; Process (computing); Operations research; Computer science; Reliability engineering; Computer security; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001670781,0.000916212,0.001033055,0.002231391,0.00155248,0.002482713,0.001700735,0.001347026,0.004940298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004928512,0.0003798802,0.001181381,0.001794405,0.0009069131,0.001353107,0.001721144,0.001463283,0.0002296258],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002274567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002290227,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01607974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01331951,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989883,0.0003865055,0.00004197504,0.0001497207,0.0003210317,0.0001124571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975909,0.001758739,0.0001558703,0.00009275186,0.000288316,0.0001135128],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000181315,0.000346535,0.005134535,0.0001109503,0.0001077457,0.0005738745,0.0005974559,0.8164126,0.001495921,0.08612181,0.001458282,0.08745896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001782182,0.00007294017,0.001193276,0.00001369426,0.00002960978,0.00009875395,0.0002517441,0.9573116,0.0003813865,0.03916122,0.0014373,0.00003078242],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1514209,0.0003845132,0.8280882,0.001092111,0.00008969518,0.0002031572,0.0002842263,0.0002658052,0.01817138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8542983,0.0006184218,0.1354394,0.0001058932,0.00008958732,0.0002368443,0.0001954369,0.00009465258,0.008921462],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01607974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03197223,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01439590492589864,"score_gpt":0.2603051977811958,"score_spread":0.2459092928552971,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}