{"id":"W2045239002","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.10.004","title":"Computer intensive methods for controlling bias in a generalized species diversity index","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico","keywords":"Jackknife resampling; Species richness; Quadrat; Statistics; Estimator; Diversity index; Mathematics; Econometrics; Abundance (ecology); Sample size determination; Ecology; Sampling (signal processing); Sampling bias; Species diversity; Generalized entropy index; Biology; Computer science; Cluster analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005138037,0.0001193173,0.0002771684,0.00008340312,0.0003216495,0.00001698635,0.000203584,0.0001504633,0.00229768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004096506,0.00009093366,0.00008142197,0.0002053386,0.0003664253,0.000105104,0.0006063057,0.0001571617,0.0001838453],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001486347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004672724,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008715638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002435916,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989195,0.0002027186,0.0002289635,0.0002825187,0.00007222128,0.0002941027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988235,0.000884127,0.00011753,0.00008215031,0.00002155335,0.00007113504],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001790001,0.00007858795,0.9923847,0.000002070174,0.00002628503,0.000002490148,0.0005201401,0.001410951,0.00006026107,0.0009438116,0.001400052,0.003152796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000758444,0.0001106583,0.955368,0.000001575173,0.000008552141,7.153528e-7,0.000185113,0.03478732,0.00002499498,0.007507609,0.001127875,0.0001191639],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9597932,0.00002043915,0.03726067,0.0009571259,0.0002107408,0.0005972178,0.000002439582,0.00003313783,0.00112506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9654425,0.0000184246,0.03165203,0.002418386,0.00002730785,0.0001331973,0.000004441813,0.000004204941,0.0002994589],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03701667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986144,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04851888286837503,"score_gpt":0.3039040667534538,"score_spread":0.2553851838850788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}