{"id":"W2045366815","doi":"10.2316/journal.206.2006.1.206-2806","title":"A MODEL FOR OPTIMIZATION AND CONTROL OF SPATIAL COMPLIANT MANIPULATORS","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Robotics and Automation","topic":"Piezoelectric Actuators and Control","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kinematics; Computer science; Inverse kinematics; Compliant mechanism; Sensitivity (control systems); Control engineering; Control theory (sociology); Parallel manipulator; Inverse; Robot; Control (management); Finite element method; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003541195,0.0005181785,0.0005558493,0.000326293,0.0003559304,0.0007464684,0.0007760082,0.0009772792,0.003324873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000646151,0.0002900394,0.0005343831,0.0003759966,0.0007306026,0.0007298935,0.0006247551,0.0007243417,0.000739923],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006104524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008353446,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003642334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002663649,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998165,0.00003491804,0.000009199681,0.00003353823,0.00008762669,0.00001836044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998537,0.00005512592,0.00003174062,0.00001447183,0.00003612192,0.000008827392],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001097032,0.000008049868,0.00006541081,0.00003481577,0.000005562697,0.00003339367,0.00002419312,0.9526445,0.001668349,0.04034734,0.0003328961,0.004824527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007788643,0.00002005237,0.0000590121,0.000004687342,0.000002540741,0.00001287333,0.000007513774,0.9875754,0.0002683847,0.01003831,0.001998524,0.000004938332],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007794277,0.0002093701,0.9747467,0.0002152436,0.0000367074,0.00003445882,0.00009689316,0.0001555043,0.01671074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8042986,0.001304502,0.1574375,0.0001608128,0.00009799365,0.0007662058,0.0003600141,0.0001501367,0.03542424],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003642334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01112276,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007307879331221795,"score_gpt":0.2077678359634412,"score_spread":0.2004599566322194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}