{"id":"W2045482626","doi":"10.1080/01435698.2000.9753020","title":"A CONCEPTUAL MODEL OF WOODLAND USE AND CHANGE IN ZIMBABWE","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Tree Crops Journal","topic":"African studies and sociopolitical issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Woodland; Livelihood; Context (archaeology); Conceptual model; Environmental planning; Conceptual framework; Geography; Environmental resource management; System dynamics; Natural resource economics; Business; Ecology; Economics; Sociology; Agriculture; Computer science; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009624505,0.0005100797,0.0002874564,0.001743752,0.001799277,0.004579647,0.001713588,0.001282106,0.007338233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001986111,0.0003331784,0.0005721508,0.00280785,0.003594714,0.004925214,0.001928541,0.001232563,0.0003616802],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005668384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002697928,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05107196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0408843,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993505,0.0003201314,0.00003160132,0.0001047742,0.00007656514,0.0001163856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994635,0.0002432951,0.00008419938,0.00004238764,0.00008615798,0.00008050729],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001537433,0.00003108129,0.002178994,0.0000651517,0.00001453709,0.0002380061,0.004303695,0.02026972,0.0001906024,0.9676151,0.0007413484,0.004336388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008170737,0.0001368097,0.008411586,0.0004574371,0.00006589264,0.0005134731,0.02444668,0.152242,0.0002723972,0.6619195,0.1513653,0.00008727901],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4513969,0.004379553,0.2262204,0.03505617,0.0002310884,0.0007188788,0.003217224,0.0002136352,0.2785662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9770114,0.001023561,0.01353705,0.0002880721,0.00001903097,0.0004176179,0.0002587661,0.00001367768,0.007430778],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05107196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1015493,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1226279727394952,"score_gpt":0.3681295526193926,"score_spread":0.2455015798798975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}