{"id":"W2045682424","doi":"10.5558/tfc82416-3","title":"A national portrait of community forestry on public land in Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forestry Chronicle","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service; University of New Brunswick","funders":"Canadian Forest Service; U.S. Forest Service","keywords":"Public land; Community forestry; Government (linguistics); Local government; Forest management; Corporate governance; Forestry; Land management; Environmental resource management; Geography; Business; Public administration; Environmental planning; Land use; Political science; Finance; Ecology; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003776093,0.0001673416,0.0001812977,0.003605841,0.008842598,0.003068086,0.0006131843,0.0003922595,0.005830285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000749018,0.0001364169,0.0001491176,0.00729794,0.001828915,0.0007417614,0.0009741686,0.0008332661,0.0002496049],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07530122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1024771,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9956454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990547,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998933,0.00005794357,0.0000155601,0.00007012088,0.0004102,0.0005130718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986438,0.00008107448,0.00008056271,0.00002802463,0.0006808239,0.0004856533],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000130512,0.000133303,0.2078792,0.0007534807,0.00005037844,0.002325995,0.08311534,0.001579441,0.002664795,0.1933001,0.1844172,0.3236504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004992603,0.00001814736,0.3803527,0.000298413,0.00001696279,0.0003687844,0.0475167,0.0004507215,0.0001700377,0.001776017,0.5689927,0.00003376008],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3584971,0.01630048,0.001200841,0.01594687,0.0002573245,0.0001456293,0.00451388,0.0001049817,0.6030329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9436737,0.00845451,0.001259511,0.00109292,0.00003258307,0.00004403842,0.001102828,0.00003194771,0.04430778],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9246988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5463511,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01637102546784656,"score_gpt":0.2250619869852203,"score_spread":0.2086909615173737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}