{"id":"W2045682424","doi":"10.5558/tfc82416-3","title":"A national portrait of community forestry on public land in Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forestry Chronicle","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service; University of New Brunswick","funders":"Canadian Forest Service; U.S. Forest Service","keywords":"Public land; Community forestry; Government (linguistics); Local government; Forest management; Corporate governance; Forestry; Land management; Environmental resource management; Geography; Business; Public administration; Environmental planning; Land use; Political science; Finance; Ecology; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002687068,0.00008153862,0.00007933111,0.00002379962,0.0001105404,0.00001175478,0.0003740788,0.00002471083,0.001111347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002038272,0.00006082971,0.00002558971,0.000217123,0.0001411152,0.00009209555,0.0001376303,0.0001890416,0.00007744769],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005611641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002214537,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9435078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.976325,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991292,0.00006061867,0.0001684045,0.00007110649,0.000334805,0.0002358474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995847,0.00007628423,0.00006869541,0.0002358225,0.000004694587,0.0000297972],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001800569,0.0001395559,0.8748385,0.00001380358,0.00000576804,0.000003865908,0.00007219988,0.0339967,0.00004252612,0.01241536,0.07767133,0.0007823798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003753195,0.00003534104,0.9817262,0.000006663518,0.000002329039,0.000002077592,0.00002649745,0.00288574,0.00009583384,0.006137457,0.008629637,0.00007689054],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9046799,0.00001228711,0.00000162631,0.0009655195,0.00002777431,0.0001014066,0.00001629342,0.000007926521,0.09418728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988222,0.000001479593,0.0000142219,0.000293633,0.00003669522,0.000009270173,0.00002307899,0.00000695318,0.0007925265],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1068877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998018,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01637102546784656,"score_gpt":0.2250619869852203,"score_spread":0.2086909615173737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}