{"id":"W2045733216","doi":"10.1190/geo2011-0317.1","title":"Analysis of gravity gradiometer inverse problems using optimal design measures","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Geophysics","topic":"Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Geological Survey of Canada","funders":"Natural Resources Canada","keywords":"Gradiometer; Singular value decomposition; Tensor (intrinsic definition); Inversion (geology); Set (abstract data type); Inverse; Matrix (chemical analysis); Computer science; Compatibility (geochemistry); Field (mathematics); Mathematics; Data mining; Mathematical optimization; Algorithm; Physics; Geology; Geometry; Pure mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000518022,0.0001578405,0.0004047454,0.0002016326,0.00009380219,0.00001995357,0.0001759774,0.00006382327,0.0001770835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005291236,0.0001226031,0.0002493518,0.002507984,0.00009479126,0.0002684119,0.00001420541,0.0001364322,0.00006013385],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000484851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002618505,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002192132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004618762,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984766,0.0002678588,0.0002264871,0.0001977947,0.0003516758,0.0004795656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991326,0.0002544741,0.0001247125,0.0002149896,0.00007054946,0.0002026308],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000955559,0.0003469805,0.3525955,0.00005250427,0.001400162,0.000002627444,0.001069945,0.3229917,0.005476407,0.0002098897,0.00007228848,0.3156865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001482163,0.0001753937,0.8145944,0.000005717442,0.001156261,0.000001345615,0.00002748299,0.1779954,0.00202493,0.003358022,0.0002244636,0.0002883267],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9428673,0.0001647039,0.05643973,0.00001128729,0.0001463324,0.000125421,0.00003315856,0.00002319185,0.0001888339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9696448,0.000007185255,0.03008682,0.00005551997,0.0001325475,9.140432e-7,0.00002886709,0.000003394849,0.00003989259],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4619989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4999607,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.078631176828142,"score_gpt":0.26723226359242,"score_spread":0.188601086764278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}