{"id":"W2045920322","doi":"10.1108/14720700710827149","title":"The top team: examining board composition and firm performance","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Corporate Governance","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":143,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Team composition; Corporate governance; Mandate; Agency (philosophy); Business; Originality; Index (typography); Composition (language); Value (mathematics); Population; Benchmark (surveying); Set (abstract data type); Accounting; Marketing; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Computer science; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004377273,0.0003018677,0.0002632448,0.002759653,0.0009178214,0.002709077,0.0005619896,0.0003395506,0.003686882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02171418,0.0001189587,0.0001856384,0.002102591,0.0006855054,0.001577127,0.00145225,0.0004716957,0.0005268571],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001167116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009846273,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007451402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009598653,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967855,0.001048062,0.0002790802,0.0004219844,0.0009305182,0.0005347697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9643298,0.008211899,0.01720826,0.001084717,0.003706538,0.005458662],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008951863,0.0001544235,0.9712432,0.00003647835,0.00005372083,0.00004986807,0.0007613815,0.0003665664,0.0002806022,0.0003628213,0.000488181,0.02611323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005306013,0.000184265,0.9943138,0.00003751561,0.00002285175,0.0000362978,0.002827632,0.0009223495,0.000295611,0.0003707904,0.000975122,0.000008320475],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929798,0.000200887,0.000832966,0.0001966848,0.00002474623,0.00005212136,0.0001086682,0.00001502951,0.0055891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985107,0.0000726831,0.0005582999,0.00002824072,0.00002667558,0.00001513177,0.0001416708,0.000004235415,0.0006423005],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007451402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02314955,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02560621720229152,"score_gpt":0.2031560107625922,"score_spread":0.1775497935603006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}