{"id":"W2045920322","doi":"10.1108/14720700710827149","title":"The top team: examining board composition and firm performance","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Corporate Governance","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":143,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Team composition; Corporate governance; Mandate; Agency (philosophy); Business; Originality; Index (typography); Composition (language); Value (mathematics); Population; Benchmark (surveying); Set (abstract data type); Accounting; Marketing; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Computer science; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006508352,0.0002312916,0.0001924788,0.00003243702,0.0006039613,0.0002890994,0.0003065383,0.00007074535,0.00001786359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004834777,0.0001839241,0.0000354946,0.0004844718,0.0001740001,0.001287971,0.0001448342,0.0002096655,0.0001879817],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005655621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002570361,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001573646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001709393,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998497,0.000005663455,0.0003388294,0.0003597877,0.0003464983,0.0004522394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983715,0.00008418428,0.001021345,0.0003509809,0.0001519563,0.00001996398],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000255764,0.00003921046,0.9070472,0.00009457078,0.00001424588,0.00002811484,0.00002995319,0.00006290559,0.001247857,0.02234211,0.0139117,0.0549264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000468908,0.00001687576,0.8542101,0.00009294162,0.00001421791,0.000003976982,0.00002443764,0.0009939431,0.0002200696,0.0005349601,0.1431694,0.0002501283],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9876723,0.0008324147,0.0008806557,0.000487256,0.0006623899,0.0002182313,0.000007045416,0.00009732931,0.009142371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960362,0.0003991362,0.0001192322,0.001182087,0.0008146929,0.00001143318,0.000009204894,0.00002839486,0.001399673],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1292577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7500209,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02560621720229152,"score_gpt":0.2031560107625922,"score_spread":0.1775497935603006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}