{"id":"W2045988882","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2004.0006","title":"A New Approach to Old Cases: Reconsidering Statutes of Limitation","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Principal (computer security); Maximization; Political science; Rules of evidence; Computer science; Law; Psychology; Law and economics; Economics; Social psychology; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003741046,0.0000515682,0.0001309469,0.00003649726,0.0003846387,0.00003190456,0.0002567214,0.00004647192,0.0003255493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002093973,0.00005989334,0.00006162146,0.00007092235,0.00008984264,0.0006589899,0.000038304,0.00006633333,0.000007377459],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000313982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003590207,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07550656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16646,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992645,0.00005334427,0.0001283733,0.0001003103,0.0003178203,0.0001356163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992285,0.0001148174,0.0001713375,0.00008121094,0.0002325596,0.0001715254],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003970946,0.0003583185,0.0007788819,0.00007516057,0.0001618973,0.0001095351,0.3498902,0.00854192,0.0005452891,0.5511828,0.01164757,0.07631128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003721363,0.0006315505,0.006885782,0.000682912,0.0001940426,0.000174176,0.5004565,0.00001716288,0.001149604,0.03608369,0.4493256,0.0006776703],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3628312,0.00100604,0.09446109,0.001777219,0.0004764829,0.0003730722,0.00001622416,0.00006832921,0.5389904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8708771,0.0001735303,0.1275016,0.00004134981,0.00006203528,1.87777e-8,4.315319e-7,0.000003895023,0.001339998],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5376503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9306497,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06766223257713491,"score_gpt":0.2926820225917903,"score_spread":0.2250197900146554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}