{"id":"W2046078038","doi":"10.4309/jgi.2006.17.10","title":"The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): A rebuttal to critics","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Gambling Issues","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rebuttal; Construct (python library); Psychology; Pathological; Construct validity; Generalization; Developmental psychology; Psychometrics; Medicine; Epistemology; Pathology; Philosophy; Computer science; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001049937,0.0002739948,0.0004212245,0.0003529642,0.0003972592,0.000304029,0.0005083201,0.000151307,0.0001151678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001892235,0.000190832,0.0002970687,0.00038947,0.00009182363,0.0001519854,0.00006481601,0.0004756183,0.0002387273],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008416866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005793729,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003592662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007578773,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973875,0.0001475242,0.0009150323,0.0002651003,0.0006733297,0.0006115177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981524,0.0002508253,0.000424043,0.000448921,0.0005153421,0.0002084994],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004367581,0.004930635,0.6464077,0.00008924612,0.002321244,0.006494889,0.04103841,0.001904194,0.01258085,0.02704469,0.1854644,0.06735617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01204702,0.004531762,0.4364535,0.001168514,0.001885981,0.00243717,0.01987786,0.0001048308,0.01066013,0.007963142,0.5008026,0.002067521],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9862787,0.003464437,0.0009518871,0.002432358,0.002691112,0.0002058147,0.00001664985,0.00006628594,0.003892771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859385,0.00003673365,0.003432025,0.0001526487,0.001601378,0.000007062391,0.000004419809,0.00005834125,0.008768871],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3153382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7781902,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2170192415640838,"score_gpt":0.4521553882461514,"score_spread":0.2351361466820677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}