{"id":"W2046126924","doi":"10.1016/j.cplett.2008.12.095","title":"Kinetic critical temperature and optimized chemical vapor deposition growth of carbon nanotubes","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chemical Physics Letters","topic":"Carbon Nanotubes in Composites","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada; Institute for Microstructural Sciences; University of Ottawa","funders":"Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Carbon nanotube; Chemical vapor deposition; Raman spectroscopy; Kinetic energy; Growth rate; Materials science; Carbon fibers; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Chemical physics; Chemical engineering; Nanotechnology; Chemistry; Optics; Composite material; Organic chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000823312,0.0002509358,0.0004084674,0.00003379611,0.00003600612,0.00006643566,0.000253159,0.0001435584,0.00001163729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001521338,0.0002392463,0.0001065868,0.0001797807,0.0004339759,0.0001263085,0.00009288501,0.0002341742,0.000002866677],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005773388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001643735,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001453983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.892748e-8,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984623,0.00004368374,0.0003377585,0.000459667,0.0003484835,0.000348148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991297,0.0002829357,0.00006816172,0.0002900781,0.00009524517,0.0001338639],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001063099,0.0001216637,0.00002701269,0.00006077321,0.00000653942,0.00001071184,0.00007764954,0.00001000193,0.9982131,0.0009921853,0.0002673666,0.0001066481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006126323,0.0000463621,0.00005080932,0.00008404793,0.00005791008,0.00002688854,0.000003664505,0.0003604145,0.9964036,0.002087549,0.000001562485,0.0002645212],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966505,0.0001354024,0.0002041264,0.002383503,0.0001704409,0.0001365312,0.00001236765,0.00008831606,0.0002187966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879678,0.000005338082,0.01013328,0.001466597,0.0003767387,0.000009671603,0.00001804998,0.00002108793,0.000001438077],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009929155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9756179,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005941002548705224,"score_gpt":0.2247054509095328,"score_spread":0.2187644483608276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}