{"id":"W2046128670","doi":"10.2310/7070.2005.34605","title":"Assessment of Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis with Different Imaging Methods in Patients with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Otolaryngology","topic":"Head and Neck Cancer Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Radiology; Magnetic resonance imaging; Neck dissection; Metastasis; Malignancy; Otorhinolaryngology; Occult; Predictive value of tests; Lymph node; Cervical lymphadenopathy; Prospective cohort study; Nuclear medicine; Head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma; Carcinoma; Head and neck cancer; Radiation therapy; Pathology; Cancer; Surgery; Internal medicine; Disease","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004707395,0.0001584248,0.0007255314,0.0001472437,0.00004548269,0.000004024014,0.00009906914,0.00003455785,0.00003028226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002009051,0.00007612264,0.00004847273,0.0001199061,0.0001481527,0.00006699393,0.00005895049,0.000294065,2.302686e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000110777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001143055,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007714429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005461139,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986541,0.0003194924,0.0004315017,0.0001133655,0.0002501259,0.0002314353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990496,0.0002315124,0.0002888792,0.000170102,0.0001604439,0.00009947336],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00126232,0.000475063,0.993865,0.0001015557,0.00007271957,0.00003345426,0.0005703576,0.00003350417,0.0006647363,0.000009225762,0.00001601777,0.00289612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00855114,0.001986046,0.9867637,0.0001007291,0.0003503264,0.0002736946,0.0001677144,0.0002796696,0.001371806,0.000006798341,0.00007047671,0.00007795444],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954097,0.001297098,0.001044519,0.001518919,0.00003635179,0.0001812245,0.00000232008,0.000003153531,0.0005067187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9832946,0.0000621971,0.01614045,0.0004282499,0.0000449986,0.000003361081,8.816128e-7,0.00001575811,0.000009494614],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01509593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3104191,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01577448312908977,"score_gpt":0.3181194760871745,"score_spread":0.3023449929580847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}