{"id":"W2046145332","doi":"10.1142/s1464333203001413","title":"Achieving Effectiveness in Stakeholder Participation Using the GIS-Based Collaborative Spatial Delphi Methodology","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management","topic":"Delphi Technique in Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Stakeholder; Delphi method; Participatory GIS; Citizen journalism; Spatial planning; Participatory planning; Process (computing); Delphi; Process management; Spatial analysis; Stakeholder engagement; Knowledge management; Spatial design; Environmental resource management; Management science; Computer science; Environmental planning; Business; Geography; Engineering; Political science; Space (punctuation); Environmental science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005944624,0.0001064838,0.0001896103,0.00026566,0.0002862875,0.00006962119,0.0001710222,0.00005450473,0.00004734169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001831157,0.00008277308,0.00004408913,0.0003026736,0.0002989916,0.0002132772,0.00006732973,0.0002095097,4.635889e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008186109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001515532,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004192494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000228355,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956123,0.003074101,0.0003437976,0.0001397012,0.0005387065,0.0002913577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988595,0.0006707412,0.0002623872,0.0001087699,0.00001926337,0.00007935246],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009350234,0.003904583,0.318301,0.0004351677,0.0009122372,0.0005179007,0.02186731,0.03501443,0.04552584,0.4450309,0.0002715013,0.1272841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003346317,0.0007424125,0.9275796,0.0002484753,0.0002088692,0.00001160932,0.03332189,0.0008112082,0.003253681,0.008051622,0.02199223,0.0004320773],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9250836,0.0001119895,0.06847474,0.001867764,0.0001180977,0.0008435089,0.000004495482,0.000006312461,0.003489508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864892,0.000387277,0.01281453,0.0001718187,0.00006415361,0.000034175,5.488651e-7,0.000008767499,0.00002952596],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6092786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3375388,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2285736797745486,"score_gpt":0.5032299948802599,"score_spread":0.2746563151057113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}