{"id":"W2046188365","doi":"10.1080/02614367.2014.986508","title":"Applying event leveraging using OGI data: a case study of Vancouver 2010","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leisure Studies","topic":"Sport and Mega-Event Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Leverage (statistics); Event (particle physics); Event data; Host (biology); Context (archaeology); Process (computing); Mega-; Framing (construction); Perspective (graphical); Public relations; Government (linguistics); Computer science; Socioeconomic status; Business; Data science; Marketing; Process management; Sociology; Political science; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002375642,0.0004847608,0.0005019449,0.002042088,0.004546992,0.002534698,0.00165525,0.001304466,0.002627732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007887984,0.0003483958,0.0002604883,0.00645243,0.001754197,0.0009304531,0.002368743,0.001517657,0.000359822],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008338692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057327,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4924866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7589849,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978326,0.00103819,0.00009576277,0.0001920835,0.0004584014,0.0003829169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956059,0.002229366,0.0004148147,0.0003072161,0.0007490437,0.0006936287],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000503902,0.003131266,0.4544054,0.001065755,0.0002885038,0.04760616,0.2829319,0.009139956,0.003946023,0.01319604,0.01277905,0.1710061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006391486,0.0004365327,0.3760297,0.0004382448,0.00009033517,0.001836593,0.5594482,0.006981626,0.001366065,0.002746649,0.05045377,0.000108448],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9862174,0.000157377,0.001078371,0.0005866329,0.0000106386,0.0002761292,0.0004992791,0.00001667891,0.01115763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916824,0.0005061562,0.002938117,0.0001246935,0.00001133146,0.0001436429,0.0005030911,0.00002177132,0.004068713],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5075134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97924,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2478849534825648,"score_gpt":0.4357196197265233,"score_spread":0.1878346662439585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}