{"id":"W2046188365","doi":"10.1080/02614367.2014.986508","title":"Applying event leveraging using OGI data: a case study of Vancouver 2010","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leisure Studies","topic":"Sport and Mega-Event Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Leverage (statistics); Event (particle physics); Event data; Host (biology); Context (archaeology); Process (computing); Mega-; Framing (construction); Perspective (graphical); Public relations; Government (linguistics); Computer science; Socioeconomic status; Business; Data science; Marketing; Process management; Sociology; Political science; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001627067,0.0001431803,0.0003828839,0.0000731241,0.0007534622,0.00002595739,0.0002529986,0.00004404324,0.00001336053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003730487,0.0001220651,0.00004295667,0.0002515503,0.0001340503,0.0003333045,0.0002807328,0.0001219544,0.000002524293],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006956688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008792609,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01369835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07541785,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984636,0.0001629071,0.0002857615,0.000296016,0.0004510333,0.0003406333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990063,0.0001671068,0.0001900041,0.0004069147,0.000150718,0.00007901216],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006055887,0.001396992,0.4912032,0.000232316,0.001298583,0.0009837422,0.4330749,0.0008826121,0.0002312496,0.001011967,0.02373489,0.04588893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001721623,0.0002555056,0.005083591,0.0002120701,0.0004982756,0.00004613682,0.6718109,0.0004854155,0.00006038827,0.0003371942,0.3189139,0.0005750291],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957488,0.0007311131,0.0001952684,0.0000579193,0.001668484,0.0007161138,0.000003519604,0.00004918197,0.0008295954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986596,0.00004947529,0.0002664145,0.00002906264,0.000422343,0.00002535207,0.000001113804,0.000012623,0.0005340321],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4861196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9928695,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2478849534825648,"score_gpt":0.4357196197265233,"score_spread":0.1878346662439585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}