{"id":"W2046368502","doi":"10.1016/j.diabres.2012.04.010","title":"Higher magnification lenses versus conventional lenses for evaluation of diabetic neuropathy by corneal in vivo confocal microscopy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice","topic":"Ocular Surface and Contact Lens","field":"Medicine","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Magnification; Confocal microscopy; Confocal; Medicine; In vivo; Ophthalmology; Lens (geology); Diabetes mellitus; Diabetic neuropathy; Optics; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007407188,0.0001109292,0.0003051195,0.0000893542,0.00007427994,0.00003090167,0.00007511055,0.0001521215,0.0002438325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01156927,0.000102049,0.00008857362,0.0001802982,0.0004650141,0.0003820409,0.00004409789,0.0004381466,0.00002675431],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005539088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002062998,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003927452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005640725,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968534,0.001024478,0.0005409577,0.0002937293,0.0008150319,0.00047239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900318,0.008162204,0.00016363,0.0002389517,0.001175483,0.0002279325],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.007223286,0.004419011,0.8923013,0.0003730522,0.0002764877,0.000003328139,0.00009041582,3.206618e-7,0.06753308,0.001620662,0.006002049,0.02015704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03218989,0.01291318,0.7536617,0.0002552609,0.001210274,0.000002305519,0.001240248,0.001299021,0.0896558,0.0005359332,0.1066175,0.0004188566],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914043,0.003982731,0.00001394662,0.002097814,0.0003592962,0.0008613471,0.00005354103,0.00001018566,0.001216815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979509,0.000773035,0.0003258405,0.000291231,0.0001903902,0.00008421195,0.00007419056,0.0000184126,0.0002917717],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1386396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967567,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1759040889322789,"score_gpt":0.4965298309721861,"score_spread":0.3206257420399072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}