{"id":"W2046448571","doi":"10.1071/wr10090","title":"Estimating the population size of a threatened arboreal marsupial: use of distance sampling to dispense with ad hoc survey techniques","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Threatened species; Population size; Population; Population viability analysis; Sampling (signal processing); Distance sampling; Arboreal locomotion; Context (archaeology); Abundance (ecology); Geography; Ecology; Environmental resource management; Habitat; Computer science; Biology; Endangered species; Environmental science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002601051,0.0001028813,0.0001750575,0.00005097753,0.0002294088,0.00003208346,0.0003108412,0.00008918959,0.00009053331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002108033,0.00007006162,0.00002669242,0.0006485251,0.0004687652,0.0002361559,0.0001935908,0.0003472022,0.000009853355],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005420381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003722405,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006038303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02127353,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982173,0.0003389169,0.0002852612,0.0002758358,0.0005795817,0.0003031136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975618,0.001676942,0.0001242598,0.0004603444,0.00009870066,0.00007798216],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003330193,0.00005391559,0.9902074,0.00001016704,0.000007658486,0.000001014153,0.0001588496,0.0002924854,0.001851939,0.0001830627,0.0003039376,0.006596571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000108295,0.0001633331,0.9971638,0.00004186286,0.000004671396,0.000002176779,0.00001890529,0.001320919,0.0002120321,0.0005602146,0.0003224317,0.00008133253],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953324,0.000003521317,0.002808423,0.001121564,0.00003809121,0.0005490751,0.00002655597,0.00002449162,0.00009591106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9586484,0.000005598996,0.04102601,0.0001265263,0.00002422648,0.00005743735,0.00001728725,0.00001541808,0.00007906775],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03821759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965857,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07846261288892997,"score_gpt":0.3508823468712992,"score_spread":0.2724197339823692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}