{"id":"W2046456138","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2008.10.002","title":"Community-based approaches to strategic environmental assessment: Lessons from Costa Rica","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"The King's University; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Strategic environmental assessment; Livelihood; Environmental planning; Government (linguistics); Environmental resource management; Watershed; Process (computing); Notice; Environmental impact assessment; Business; Geography; Political science; Agriculture; Computer science; Environmental science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001112803,0.001369544,0.001442174,0.0001303739,0.001798009,0.000143169,0.001564493,0.0003007007,0.02429294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001445646,0.001241756,0.0008250151,0.0005174251,0.001037466,0.001001417,0.001318564,0.001657144,0.003401207],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00517235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001362621,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00116022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000475121,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9919972,0.001666428,0.001277783,0.001314349,0.002202567,0.001541707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957266,0.0002789775,0.0006074304,0.001899467,0.00000206355,0.0014854],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007448205,0.008212602,0.9359753,0.0002076242,0.0004965587,0.0002042433,0.0009426413,0.002198249,0.02889496,0.00008192593,0.01163542,0.01107606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001616614,0.001005167,0.9790817,0.0004112257,0.0003363382,0.00005541884,0.0005989203,0.0006192477,0.000519777,0.0003807604,0.01367751,0.001697336],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9706658,0.001820172,0.000935957,0.002398924,0.0002217236,0.002826197,0.001295475,0.0001939894,0.01964173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9757507,0.006932235,0.007271432,0.005876465,0.0001152132,0.0004579058,0.002858291,0.0001856223,0.0005521513],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04310645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999055,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1700029961097153,"score_gpt":0.3600209466307973,"score_spread":0.190017950521082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}