{"id":"W2046755099","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.02.007","title":"Understanding self-evaluations of effectiveness by forestry advisory committee members: A case of Ontario's Local Citizens Committee members","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Management","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"","keywords":"Credibility; Advisory committee; Process (computing); Forest management; Decision-making; Public participation; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Business; Forestry; Political science; Public relations; Geography; Public administration; Computer science; Marketing; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02779068,0.0003038962,0.0004190041,0.00240908,0.02061364,0.01276035,0.00259892,0.004866685,0.004180616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04525635,0.0005568736,0.0004643996,0.002908884,0.02165739,0.007511292,0.00427856,0.004054611,0.0001860713],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08064368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04512305,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9113778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9368827,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9831791,0.009656209,0.0005006135,0.0007893433,0.002447549,0.003427218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.918569,0.04991471,0.008965649,0.002811267,0.013351,0.006388344],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007815447,0.0001093782,0.07092492,0.00003849934,0.00001904337,0.0008567752,0.89636,0.0002059271,0.0001794688,0.02266315,0.002077545,0.006487126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002455347,0.00003122375,0.05066634,0.0001178251,0.00002700393,0.000112859,0.9283316,0.000573999,0.000202486,0.004657005,0.01521655,0.00003863091],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.929472,0.000250397,0.0006457741,0.01283556,0.0000159388,0.00006839952,0.00004245238,0.000008291823,0.05666126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977072,0.00007123671,0.0001605188,0.0002782333,0.000005354434,0.00001831458,0.00001469342,0.000004802156,0.001739608],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08862221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5851136,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01800855012179596,"score_gpt":0.2403050915678696,"score_spread":0.2222965414460737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}