{"id":"W2046755099","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.02.007","title":"Understanding self-evaluations of effectiveness by forestry advisory committee members: A case of Ontario's Local Citizens Committee members","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Management","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"","keywords":"Credibility; Advisory committee; Process (computing); Forest management; Decision-making; Public participation; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Business; Forestry; Political science; Public relations; Geography; Public administration; Computer science; Marketing; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008938099,0.0002961911,0.0004452286,0.0001987095,0.0001639103,0.00002470289,0.0003863089,0.00008626434,0.003755783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004040355,0.0002856006,0.0002730852,0.0002200558,0.0005349428,0.0003691635,0.0004047404,0.0002476429,0.00003896074],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002633798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001622031,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006466527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003288845,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974903,0.0001960008,0.0008697578,0.000256465,0.0008260182,0.0003614415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985981,0.0001379007,0.0007830822,0.0003533302,0.000005905776,0.0001216872],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001056306,0.008034214,0.608015,0.001331846,0.002963343,0.002874239,0.005183729,0.2018555,0.005643636,0.01110237,0.1442995,0.007640264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02788059,0.005235765,0.7687203,0.001477166,0.006161946,0.001959427,0.01566921,0.00983138,0.006991901,0.02663417,0.126048,0.003390235],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9472548,0.0001125063,0.003121203,0.00008907384,0.0001672488,0.0006001037,0.00003683286,0.0000145442,0.04860363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961488,0.00005784099,0.001638339,0.0000577365,0.00003097615,0.00001182573,0.00001864032,0.0000305689,0.002005327],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1920242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999596,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01800855012179596,"score_gpt":0.2403050915678696,"score_spread":0.2222965414460737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}