{"id":"W2046787709","doi":"10.1007/s00267-008-9133-3","title":"Capturing Old-Growth Values for Use in Forest Decision-Making","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Management","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Forest management; Compromise; TRIPS architecture; Sustainable forest management; Nova scotia; Geography; Diversity (politics); Environmental resource management; Value (mathematics); Nature Conservation; Political science; Forestry; Sociology; Ecology; Social science; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002051858,0.0002702531,0.0001883882,0.0001559057,0.000250176,0.00004489661,0.0003897542,0.00005464539,0.001584999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002262584,0.0002727054,0.0001164066,0.000177349,0.0002088497,0.0005413583,0.000728387,0.00009589312,0.00146725],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004457515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001159323,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002525621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001669238,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980764,0.0000286006,0.00034226,0.000565659,0.0004353206,0.0005517415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993164,0.0001136934,0.00008598222,0.0003962466,9.448842e-7,0.0000867183],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009444522,0.0002912398,0.9596261,0.00002727029,0.00003601996,0.0001507496,0.0004995999,0.01244128,0.00003892107,0.001074601,0.01683097,0.008888828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001098654,0.00008172412,0.9673605,0.00005477279,0.00002603257,0.000008223838,0.0001127567,0.004761259,0.00003415636,0.003520565,0.02250875,0.00043263],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9819512,0.00003025861,0.002053414,0.00008373188,0.0001619749,0.001047652,0.00001077446,0.00005606981,0.01460497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9734352,0.0001804007,0.01698427,0.0007118279,0.00005452273,0.000175705,0.00001892868,0.00004320557,0.008395988],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01493086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999725,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01277185775276613,"score_gpt":0.220752001404266,"score_spread":0.2079801436514999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}