{"id":"W2046839936","doi":"10.1002/icd.492","title":"Reciprocal and complementary sibling interactions, relationship quality and socio‐emotional problem solving","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Infant and Child Development","topic":"Cognitive Abilities and Testing","field":"Psychology","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Concordia University","keywords":"Psychology; Dyad; Reciprocal; Developmental psychology; Sibling; Sibling relationship; Dominance (genetics); Association (psychology); Rivalry; Social psychology; Social relation","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009110225,0.0003885998,0.000266804,0.0008988382,0.0009117199,0.0007396878,0.0003660347,0.0001821803,0.002394167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003739303,0.0002003637,0.0002039566,0.0005652703,0.0006427058,0.0001814292,0.0005909281,0.000332499,0.0001008986],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001429069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001318972,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1586152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3324133,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992571,0.0001474961,0.00004363416,0.00008226235,0.000339178,0.0001303891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979425,0.0003716128,0.000873064,0.00007549563,0.0002452052,0.0004921379],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004120163,0.00006477143,0.994081,0.0000100386,0.00003899818,0.000164633,0.001660959,0.00005556879,0.0006943523,0.00005618512,0.00006620168,0.003066089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002105621,0.00004193021,0.9984316,0.000004599618,0.00001300557,0.0001822858,0.001011687,0.00008167211,0.000101163,0.00002005076,0.0001066067,0.000003186533],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996608,0.00004252121,0.00001845117,0.000007260423,5.486832e-7,0.000001691947,0.00002973179,8.036467e-7,0.0002380398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995882,0.00005244941,0.0001008703,0.0000025011,7.159692e-7,0.000002983823,0.00006044576,6.522413e-7,0.0001911691],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1586152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3153839,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08699030755406735,"score_gpt":0.3671571746241556,"score_spread":0.2801668670700883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}