{"id":"W2046903225","doi":"10.5539/jsd.v6n12p111","title":"An Ecological Approach to Riparian-Buffer Definition, and Implications for Timber Harvests in Nova Scotia, Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Sustainable Development","topic":"Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Dalhousie University; Department of Agriculture, Nova Scotia; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Riparian zone; Riparian buffer; Watershed; Wildlife; Environmental science; Buffer zone; Habitat; Wetland; Land use; Riparian forest; Geography; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Water resource management; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009178743,0.0003229321,0.0002090897,0.003261994,0.004945733,0.004120402,0.001734839,0.0003868647,0.002383924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003462926,0.0002430712,0.0003017425,0.005544554,0.00199473,0.0005732013,0.001213976,0.0005727707,0.0001507657],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07539607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09541048,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9970036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991714,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991592,0.000111803,0.00004849454,0.00008213655,0.0003023977,0.0002959053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978977,0.0002497657,0.0001671853,0.00003695494,0.001324238,0.000324166],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001462009,0.000131575,0.7260622,0.0005860114,0.00006244516,0.003127007,0.01166549,0.01724998,0.002370565,0.06862307,0.03369548,0.13628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001265392,0.0000428747,0.8663457,0.0006987671,0.00006427582,0.0004536353,0.04172911,0.008067335,0.000621155,0.003617782,0.07825588,0.00009080401],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7495608,0.01200022,0.01312778,0.01363743,0.0003178007,0.001000119,0.009126265,0.0001790348,0.2010505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9621743,0.004437653,0.01243669,0.0006235046,0.00003423194,0.0001080065,0.001350175,0.00003522963,0.01880032],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07539607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5470393,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01450927807975486,"score_gpt":0.2227066315001587,"score_spread":0.2081973534204038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}