{"id":"W2046970161","doi":"10.1007/s13235-015-0152-4","title":"On the Evolution of Partial Respect for Ownership","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dynamic Games and Applications","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Inefficiency; Outcome (game theory); CONTEST; Evolutionarily stable strategy; Mathematical economics; Property (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Microeconomics; Economics; Convention; Range (aeronautics); Game theory; Law; Political science; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002025769,0.00003101387,0.00004934744,0.00001271117,0.0001863285,0.00001225491,0.00007032981,0.00001887101,0.000003650604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003465368,0.00002257209,0.00002066965,0.00005095263,0.000210206,0.00002270434,0.00001516004,0.00002064983,0.000004293003],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001098053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003897391,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004706079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004318691,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997116,0.0000180145,0.00007134235,0.00008176197,0.00004411391,0.00007321602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997166,0.00009902936,0.00004286264,0.00008149689,0.00003062595,0.00002941064],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006696458,0.0000230659,0.0005877282,9.996728e-7,0.000003304073,5.243473e-9,0.001824277,0.000007498448,0.0001605199,0.9955717,0.0003341124,0.001480148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009402638,0.0003372379,0.005569293,0.00002468213,0.00007284209,4.761873e-7,0.1516351,0.00364101,0.0006656087,0.6914693,0.1452947,0.0003493911],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9380745,0.000733745,0.007601614,0.01157913,0.0001014771,0.00169104,0.00008150975,0.00004954765,0.04008749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988884,0.00001995377,0.0001584064,0.00003053662,0.0000319685,0.0003857063,0.000002652931,0.000002690645,0.0004797287],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3041023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1433107,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05415431068073182,"score_gpt":0.3529112468394689,"score_spread":0.2987569361587371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}