{"id":"W2047206363","doi":"10.1002/crq.3890180204","title":"The mediator as nonviolent advocate: Revisiting the question of mediator neutrality","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mediation Quarterly","topic":"Indian History and Philosophy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Prince Edward Island","funders":"","keywords":"Neutrality; Mediation; Argument (complex analysis); Interpersonal communication; Conflict resolution; Psychology; Social psychology; Transformative mediation; Session (web analytics); Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Alternative dispute resolution; Law; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009681987,0.0001413669,0.0001573224,0.00003954227,0.0007902503,0.00009585261,0.0002665984,0.00005464457,0.002511682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005218067,0.00008473924,0.000105598,0.00005234459,0.0003243246,0.0002336006,0.000004225556,0.0001924017,0.0006083724],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004829807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006971239,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001422486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000185623,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984419,0.0003310138,0.000469011,0.0001688038,0.0003768431,0.0002124043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988477,0.0003808251,0.0002452231,0.0003227438,0.0001328158,0.00007063982],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001445773,0.00005585966,0.0004112571,0.00008433462,0.00006034697,0.00000395503,0.4314883,0.000008884261,0.00008007672,0.3484359,0.003431079,0.2157954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004246401,0.0003655544,0.001809042,0.00005619497,0.00005972969,0.000003061378,0.006532267,0.0001008675,0.0002154596,0.01681346,0.9733678,0.0002519993],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9648585,0.000913888,0.000006255474,0.009213335,0.001942534,0.000440669,0.00005567107,0.00008335734,0.02248576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936207,0.00008757529,0.0000047295,0.0003782992,0.004528161,0.00005601808,0.00004636632,0.00001493541,0.001263211],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9699367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984002,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01181832484517918,"score_gpt":0.2352769993367781,"score_spread":0.223458674491599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}