{"id":"W2047224526","doi":"10.1016/j.jcpo.2014.07.002","title":"Determining social values for resource allocation decision-making in cancer care: a Canadian experiment","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cancer Policy","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Socioeconomic status; Population; Resource allocation; Stratified sampling; Health care; Psychology; Resource (disambiguation); Actuarial science; Gerontology; Medicine; Family medicine; Business; Political science; Environmental health; Economics; Law; Computer science; Management","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03366809,0.001235067,0.001403565,0.001091487,0.01410689,0.004102594,0.003177228,0.003591687,0.01217344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0671856,0.001132845,0.001284969,0.001858361,0.007065782,0.002449762,0.002751738,0.003795447,0.0008239524],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04713235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06695157,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8787344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9272789,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9836818,0.007955312,0.0005902326,0.001463457,0.004163184,0.002146042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9301497,0.04816082,0.004131003,0.005286355,0.007182982,0.005089106],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.1077148,0.1087611,0.1734984,0.003143183,0.001461674,0.002375471,0.1546389,0.03466192,0.01879433,0.09066557,0.0716304,0.2326543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.07070588,0.06381764,0.4231996,0.001617515,0.00164665,0.0004664903,0.08365902,0.1392946,0.01120841,0.05745885,0.1442807,0.002644711],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9712951,0.0001282282,0.001443474,0.001417517,0.00009016809,0.002578829,0.0004276385,0.0000288991,0.02258999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9678947,0.0002701388,0.01084862,0.001703429,0.00006858387,0.004128333,0.0006245482,0.00004081777,0.01442091],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9528676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3419707,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.229437505238213,"score_gpt":0.5081107174373375,"score_spread":0.2786732121991246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}