{"id":"W2047224526","doi":"10.1016/j.jcpo.2014.07.002","title":"Determining social values for resource allocation decision-making in cancer care: a Canadian experiment","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cancer Policy","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Socioeconomic status; Population; Resource allocation; Stratified sampling; Health care; Psychology; Resource (disambiguation); Actuarial science; Gerontology; Medicine; Family medicine; Business; Political science; Environmental health; Economics; Law; Computer science; Management","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005103594,0.000136731,0.000683656,0.0009324889,0.0002103171,0.00007745283,0.0002657302,0.0001190907,0.00007862602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002237381,0.0001673026,0.0001422618,0.0002080509,0.00003259884,0.0002878434,0.00001849117,0.0001490852,0.00001222753],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004595777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001604844,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07497507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09710719,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965312,0.0001355743,0.002592321,0.000224965,0.0001084641,0.000407403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966979,0.0006052174,0.002198499,0.0001530059,0.0001518982,0.0001934782],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003740425,0.0001708395,0.2296027,0.001182095,0.0004264145,0.000005693021,0.1899095,0.02935681,0.00006796583,0.09897379,0.1158896,0.3340405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003934445,0.0003277745,0.1253782,0.001473499,0.00003205441,0.00001169364,0.008282072,0.01202287,0.00008306107,0.03181548,0.815852,0.0007868173],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8853795,0.01303492,0.00728672,0.08792058,0.001642298,0.0008414554,0.0002433183,0.00001568037,0.003635517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831526,0.0001359957,0.002315941,0.01074466,0.003436709,0.0001241372,0.00000207424,0.0000318754,0.00005605683],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6999624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992254,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.229437505238213,"score_gpt":0.5081107174373375,"score_spread":0.2786732121991246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}