{"id":"W2047376602","doi":"10.1016/j.jpaa.2005.06.021","title":"Oriented cohomology and motivic decompositions of relative cellular spaces","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra","topic":"Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Cohomology; Motivic cohomology; Pure mathematics; Variety (cybernetics); Algebraic variety; Equivariant cohomology; Space (punctuation); Isotropy; Group cohomology; Base (topology); Algebraic number; De Rham cohomology; Algebra over a field; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006935889,0.0005559089,0.0006428974,0.002963012,0.001360523,0.003484346,0.0008469732,0.0006641795,0.006434388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001107108,0.0004216603,0.0004927673,0.001527936,0.003029412,0.004617915,0.002150423,0.001276522,0.0005182279],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009736894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003742691,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001009708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001065747,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995821,0.00008341837,0.00002070126,0.00007912549,0.0001029588,0.0001316779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999292,0.0001578579,0.0001557077,0.00006110915,0.0001164442,0.0002169642],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001644416,0.00001223343,0.0003000504,0.00001118172,0.000004477748,0.00002984148,0.0003316628,0.0002311018,0.0005272035,0.9960033,0.0002448407,0.002287735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001414575,0.00002060543,0.0008611437,0.000008732081,0.000009753686,0.00008166311,0.0004223147,0.001931091,0.0003482641,0.9939317,0.002359092,0.00001162218],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8620126,0.001578322,0.07796642,0.00118771,0.0002240366,0.00004834778,0.0002447025,0.0001119936,0.05662586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814817,0.0004800306,0.005925298,0.0001058701,0.0002061184,0.00003068197,0.0001852749,0.00003359943,0.01155141],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006434388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02152514,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01174434099529462,"score_gpt":0.2529377876324749,"score_spread":0.2411934466371803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}