{"id":"W2047376602","doi":"10.1016/j.jpaa.2005.06.021","title":"Oriented cohomology and motivic decompositions of relative cellular spaces","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra","topic":"Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Cohomology; Motivic cohomology; Pure mathematics; Variety (cybernetics); Algebraic variety; Equivariant cohomology; Space (punctuation); Isotropy; Group cohomology; Base (topology); Algebraic number; De Rham cohomology; Algebra over a field; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004190882,0.0001193305,0.0003566367,0.0001317025,0.00007977134,0.00001154329,0.00007373922,0.00009741445,0.0001024826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005594175,0.0000942993,0.00006019825,0.0001351836,0.0001542874,0.000126808,0.00004263172,0.0002432659,0.000003289408],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001169816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002046157,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":4.029317e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001634559,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991756,0.00005388667,0.0003931037,0.0001024309,0.0001427152,0.0001322771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988964,0.000419149,0.0004232329,0.000093227,0.00007487914,0.00009311116],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001163555,0.0002226642,0.000666119,0.000069792,0.0002395017,0.00001397511,0.002227484,0.000005338403,0.01451716,0.9796152,0.0005669962,0.001739409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001504741,0.0002908936,0.001761782,0.00008663275,0.0003052677,0.0003849572,0.001909364,0.0000199226,0.0491522,0.9430508,0.001349307,0.0001841498],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9885249,0.000697132,0.007437363,0.0006304772,0.00004667014,0.0000916342,0.000004196257,0.000007782398,0.002559911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904189,0.00005883996,0.009163151,0.00006477672,0.000140374,0.00000145574,0.000001253536,0.0000107335,0.0001405265],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03656442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3845414,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01174434099529462,"score_gpt":0.2529377876324749,"score_spread":0.2411934466371803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}