{"id":"W2047405250","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.30.1.51","title":"Interactive Effects of Numerical Surface Form and Operand Parity in Cognitive Arithmetic.","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Operand; Arithmetic; Parity (physics); Multiplication (music); Numerical digit; Numerical cognition; Mathematics; Arabic numerals; Cognition; Simple (philosophy); Encoding (memory); Word (group theory); Computer science; Psychology; Combinatorics; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007117056,0.00037581,0.0002507425,0.0002473045,0.0001346725,0.0006012958,0.0001984423,0.0002690987,0.003274957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01202798,0.000240922,0.0001513782,0.0001290449,0.0006268618,0.0006817608,0.0008199599,0.0005008751,0.0002543428],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001773268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002288627,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004563881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007979342,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993007,0.0003002026,0.00004708869,0.00013779,0.0001642903,0.00004990947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897577,0.007738855,0.001107113,0.000383379,0.0002688137,0.0007442419],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02276172,0.004050504,0.2185348,0.0004623488,0.0001804363,0.001560176,0.005204848,0.00107108,0.6102577,0.003310036,0.0004867576,0.1321196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005128892,0.006200328,0.9382467,0.00003102347,0.0002036352,0.001253385,0.0006116185,0.002995309,0.04543144,0.003073722,0.001388926,0.00005102053],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985298,0.00006048803,0.0002862403,0.00002250525,0.000003892237,0.000009211645,0.00003321201,0.000009717604,0.00104493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980277,0.00004612173,0.001403551,0.00002451661,0.000005067169,0.00002454885,0.00006079875,0.00001038931,0.0003972121],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003274957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01095581,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02576524084402929,"score_gpt":0.3643069908749809,"score_spread":0.3385417500309516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}