{"id":"W2047445575","doi":"10.4028/www.scientific.net/ssp.151.203","title":"Ti/C and Ti/B Nanocomposites: Comparison of Sorption-Desorption Properties","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diffusion and defect data, solid state data. Part B, Solid state phenomena/Solid state phenomena","topic":"Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Materials science; Desorption; Sorption; Nanocomposite; Boron; Hydrogen; Amorphous solid; Chemical engineering; Economies of agglomeration; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Adsorption; Composite material; Crystallography; Physical chemistry; Organic chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009185982,0.001289188,0.00185946,0.0005334337,0.000631589,0.0006386783,0.001536536,0.000149435,0.00007471025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007474501,0.001127419,0.0001505847,0.0004914562,0.0005363125,0.002372417,0.001629373,0.0007346203,0.00009293092],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001608422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001096091,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008699835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001744394,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9932911,0.0002624008,0.002166598,0.001801957,0.0008369745,0.00164099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956716,0.0001508497,0.0005764047,0.00264278,0.0002810997,0.0006772936],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003101243,0.003414846,0.001832885,0.003838993,0.00251849,0.00009275094,0.03079924,0.07409222,0.6602027,0.0006986981,0.01203686,0.2073711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009566232,0.003246519,0.002448735,0.001707964,0.0007366824,0.00009703972,0.004297249,0.7665004,0.04760279,0.009952654,0.1477009,0.006142833],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9690353,0.006689324,0.005226054,0.0001795508,0.0007900743,0.001797704,0.01450345,0.0006771195,0.00110138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9696218,0.01933172,0.0009024901,0.0002970554,0.0002911731,0.00007354297,0.008674148,0.000209303,0.0005987578],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6924081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999986,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04550962368595714,"score_gpt":0.2919545623877214,"score_spread":0.2464449387017643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}