{"id":"W2047489657","doi":"10.1080/17483100600573230","title":"Evaluation of manual wheelchairs by individuals with spinal cord injuries","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology","topic":"Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wheelchair; Sitting; Usability; Manual wheelchair; Psychology; User satisfaction; Physical therapy; Applied psychology; Spinal cord injury; Physical medicine and rehabilitation; Patient satisfaction; Medicine; Computer science; Spinal cord; Human–computer interaction; Nursing; Psychiatry","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008118714,0.0002345085,0.0002820964,0.0005414122,0.0004244444,0.0004789195,0.0002664992,0.0002924145,0.003404597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003856493,0.00007948572,0.0003803199,0.0004453884,0.0002312367,0.00027025,0.0003765406,0.0001685656,0.0004913765],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006794805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005394153,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02655764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05660366,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991326,0.0002719199,0.00009103999,0.00003626124,0.0003274386,0.0001407968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976184,0.0002790218,0.0007350621,0.00003616132,0.00102591,0.0003053131],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002392094,0.0001452214,0.963069,0.0001454217,0.00005855452,0.0001741695,0.0023878,0.0001184959,0.0006611923,0.0000175066,0.0008261532,0.03215737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009422027,0.00044582,0.994006,0.0000382008,0.00002609451,0.0003493003,0.003489989,0.0002484549,0.0002501202,0.00001141057,0.001113596,0.00001146853],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982696,0.0001975373,0.00009724114,0.00006014627,0.000004101801,0.00002018993,0.0001366692,0.000006980647,0.001207555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987728,0.0001280267,0.0001737978,0.00005141991,0.000003817133,0.00001880924,0.0001933409,0.000002228134,0.0006557108],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02655764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05280614,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03312660292476702,"score_gpt":0.4207838240643896,"score_spread":0.3876572211396225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}