{"id":"W2047489657","doi":"10.1080/17483100600573230","title":"Evaluation of manual wheelchairs by individuals with spinal cord injuries","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology","topic":"Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wheelchair; Sitting; Usability; Manual wheelchair; Psychology; User satisfaction; Physical therapy; Applied psychology; Spinal cord injury; Physical medicine and rehabilitation; Patient satisfaction; Medicine; Computer science; Spinal cord; Human–computer interaction; Nursing; Psychiatry","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004154013,0.0002402438,0.0004813481,0.0002322193,0.0006089105,0.000005408122,0.0002742448,0.0005928978,0.0001708307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002366923,0.0001984099,0.00006044935,0.0006619364,0.006366503,0.0001493766,0.0002123804,0.0006856641,0.00001204117],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004451358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002360914,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002632591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006267772,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960925,0.001524296,0.0008870367,0.0005824381,0.000574622,0.000339109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956664,0.001365387,0.0005994239,0.000855268,0.001463467,0.00005005708],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003124717,0.0005398462,0.9485468,0.0001253217,0.00004667162,5.139935e-8,0.00007918022,0.000001719833,0.0003375512,0.02041893,0.001351362,0.02824015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001168685,0.001599143,0.9684119,0.0001151664,0.0001428522,9.614355e-7,0.008435963,0.00004633985,0.0002253678,0.01654028,0.003118264,0.0001950402],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9809027,0.0004173033,0.0008965631,0.01229651,0.00007381624,0.001691504,0.0001635166,0.0003245953,0.003233532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931223,0.00001058888,0.005573229,0.00005066294,0.00001615212,0.001041073,0.00008116299,0.00001633996,0.00008846433],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02804511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963376,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03312660292476702,"score_gpt":0.4207838240643896,"score_spread":0.3876572211396225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}