{"id":"W2047502598","doi":"10.1111/j.1469-7580.2008.00911.x","title":"Calibration of estimated biting forces in domestic canids: comparison of post‐mortem and <i>in vivo</i> measurements","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Anatomy","topic":"Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Bite force quotient; Biting; Calibration; Lever; Statistics; Mathematics; Linear regression; Skull; Biology; Anatomy; Orthodontics; Medicine; Physics; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002749476,0.0001020703,0.0006463841,0.0003608162,0.00002768914,0.000003104587,0.00005187974,0.00003425642,0.00001591035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002083031,0.00008202254,0.00005452165,0.0003373331,0.0001036252,0.0001524571,0.00002376897,0.0001574627,1.162699e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006386792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001324338,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003336592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005326924,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985577,0.00004912944,0.0008261851,0.00008562464,0.0003598186,0.0001215763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988667,0.0001030828,0.0005455329,0.00005394286,0.0003729226,0.00005786555],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003832012,0.0002157811,0.9578614,0.0001218077,0.00007419074,0.0001244335,0.001407029,0.0001488882,0.0392702,0.00001949482,0.0002528785,0.0001207405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003220531,0.0009366422,0.9416169,0.001185487,0.00008098983,0.0003469863,0.001990212,0.006149908,0.04428217,0.00004432817,0.00004840276,0.00009743024],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966616,0.002569786,0.00004336895,0.0002620403,0.00002705186,0.0001249107,0.000002387515,0.000002699095,0.0003061743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990405,0.0001239329,0.0007645026,0.0000376085,0.00001850774,9.695242e-7,8.24945e-7,0.000006260575,0.000006888277],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01624444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3344782,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08443100768861037,"score_gpt":0.3715736595067066,"score_spread":0.2871426518180963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}