{"id":"W2047512321","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2005.07.006","title":"The effectiveness of constructed wetland for treatment of woodwaste leachate","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Engineering","topic":"Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Leachate; Environmental science; Wetland; Typha; Constructed wetland; Tannin; Nutrient; Environmental engineering; Hydraulic retention time; Chemical oxygen demand; Environmental chemistry; Sewage treatment; Ecology; Chemistry; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001470172,0.0001376609,0.0001171843,0.0001071723,0.0001936327,0.0003447022,0.0001303172,0.0002382953,0.0004020866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002674629,0.00006821836,0.0001961933,0.0000798006,0.00018352,0.0002904401,0.0001567463,0.0001719238,0.00005337266],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003170049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003568446,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003804389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006096727,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998999,0.00002416731,0.00000579576,0.00001231905,0.00002413825,0.00003360327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998825,0.00004005172,0.00002143307,0.000006311662,0.00002685409,0.00002290045],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00138257,0.0001456726,0.00226,0.00009004205,0.00001889621,0.00004672064,0.00006252353,0.0005872683,0.987683,0.0001278222,0.00005859829,0.007537069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002542887,0.001538547,0.01014277,0.000004882729,0.00003627687,0.00004947176,0.00008674958,0.001975812,0.9854553,0.00004003244,0.0006344184,0.00001042284],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994338,0.0001210138,0.0001935652,0.000009709146,0.000004380267,0.000002584905,0.00001918164,0.000003916135,0.0002117151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992858,0.0001044529,0.0002556425,0.000005280356,0.000001980738,0.000002057992,0.00002793228,0.000001608063,0.0003153026],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003804389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007564485,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006091996445013696,"score_gpt":0.1999811261651261,"score_spread":0.1938891297201124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}