{"id":"W2047512321","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2005.07.006","title":"The effectiveness of constructed wetland for treatment of woodwaste leachate","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Engineering","topic":"Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Leachate; Environmental science; Wetland; Typha; Constructed wetland; Tannin; Nutrient; Environmental engineering; Hydraulic retention time; Chemical oxygen demand; Environmental chemistry; Sewage treatment; Ecology; Chemistry; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001667471,0.0001234483,0.0002247033,0.00001737505,0.00005028242,0.000005830438,0.0001031275,0.00004992808,0.0001000447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005095618,0.00007162254,0.00009015955,0.00008165883,0.0001522622,0.00003656083,0.00004284418,0.00002163609,0.000007005006],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001636634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005231676,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001256708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002136125,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993094,0.00003490959,0.0002099976,0.0001515892,0.00008661989,0.0002074537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999056,0.0006847517,0.00005989273,0.0001451606,0.000007820877,0.00004640442],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008542281,0.0008302335,0.1797312,0.0001281842,0.0004326848,0.000008197526,0.0002912064,0.2608319,0.4440796,0.003615806,0.00002822602,0.1091685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004560824,0.00204373,0.4532642,0.00004328305,0.00009896226,0.0000304178,0.00005336682,0.02063305,0.5125722,0.0003721547,0.006030569,0.0002973079],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978455,0.0000516587,0.001118389,0.00002833662,0.00008315739,0.0004748595,0.00001549404,0.00002706522,0.0003555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996861,0.00001966671,0.002957298,0.000001109528,0.00001626108,0.00009461694,0.000005362356,0.00000766085,0.00003703605],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.273533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2920682,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006091996445013696,"score_gpt":0.1999811261651261,"score_spread":0.1938891297201124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}