{"id":"W2047557748","doi":"10.1139/x11-015","title":"Geostatistical modeling of riparian forest microclimate and its implications for sampling","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kriging; Microclimate; Riparian zone; Variogram; Riparian forest; Sampling (signal processing); Environmental science; STREAMS; Hydrology (agriculture); Statistics; Sample variance; Sample size determination; Variance (accounting); Mathematics; Ecology; Habitat; Geology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002340671,0.000260489,0.000369141,0.0005370316,0.0002454179,0.0004252552,0.000595133,0.0002850561,0.0004691305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006783593,0.0003304049,0.0004106193,0.0009611021,0.0004046595,0.0005017055,0.0003675475,0.0002575783,0.0001119992],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007850152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001278936,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02624265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03804177,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992108,0.0005342106,0.00003430538,0.0000857895,0.00009269698,0.00004220535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998022,0.001437308,0.0001935965,0.0001550171,0.0001462097,0.00004588424],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006480073,0.0000415133,0.04551398,0.00003734365,0.00008029296,0.00002699419,0.00008518268,0.9301135,0.00144762,0.002361461,0.0001608028,0.02006654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005988198,0.00001631232,0.007627886,0.000002390023,0.000006940663,0.00001040814,0.0000189991,0.990701,0.0002913445,0.001223617,0.00009059184,0.000004538318],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5087534,0.0001352652,0.489359,0.0001532829,0.000005423742,0.0000970067,0.0003335504,0.0003474503,0.000815575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8963317,0.0001197193,0.1026251,0.00002430247,0.000004720896,0.0001073678,0.0003516288,0.00003948693,0.000396141],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02624265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05217981,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1271642803976714,"score_gpt":0.324276091220761,"score_spread":0.1971118108230897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}