{"id":"W2047621683","doi":"10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.105-107.827","title":"Key Factors for the Dynamic-Static Drainage Consolidation Method","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Mechanics and Materials","topic":"Geological Modeling and Analysis","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Consolidation (business); Drainage; Compaction; Geotechnical engineering; Dynamic compaction; Pore water pressure; Limiting; Engineering; Structural engineering; Mechanical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001989848,0.0005116565,0.000538578,0.001042121,0.0007683439,0.001305564,0.0009504579,0.0005578001,0.006887198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009983254,0.0005886464,0.0003484662,0.0008044798,0.0008522702,0.001958203,0.001382698,0.0008745944,0.00201326],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007049419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000835878,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009877873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001640991,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970554,0.000354603,0.0001904722,0.0003177852,0.001911246,0.0001704033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926562,0.003777393,0.0008321361,0.0006317036,0.00185154,0.0002510178],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008587355,0.0004735195,0.02871647,0.001054616,0.00009644573,0.000436979,0.000439177,0.02722234,0.2891165,0.03261809,0.002789011,0.6161782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002244566,0.002106459,0.06030178,0.0003956624,0.0003086337,0.003053247,0.0006210627,0.2792688,0.5626929,0.0123433,0.0783167,0.0003670439],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2444836,0.004907227,0.7143536,0.0006879077,0.0002815913,0.001018298,0.0001857965,0.00103487,0.0330472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8519357,0.001199796,0.139872,0.00007899008,0.000144293,0.0003351331,0.0001590827,0.0002230021,0.006052032],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006887198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02304,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03769482871431278,"score_gpt":0.2420013595761825,"score_spread":0.2043065308618697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}