{"id":"W2047648438","doi":"10.4296/cwrj2701085","title":"Toxicity Assessment and Identification for Protection of Natural Waters","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques","topic":"Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Identification (biology); Environmental science; Water quality; Natural (archaeology); Aquatic ecosystem; Chemical toxicity; Biochemical engineering; Risk analysis (engineering); Environmental protection; Environmental planning; Computer science; Environmental chemistry; Water pollutants; Business; Ecology; Engineering; Biology; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003511954,0.0007514338,0.0005864392,0.001924328,0.0009456907,0.001044213,0.001000335,0.0009673563,0.002139388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001725969,0.0002150983,0.0004422931,0.0009903054,0.001083989,0.001161926,0.001130223,0.0005682925,0.0006999249],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001838538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003832866,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004768963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007963799,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969022,0.0007969024,0.0001926728,0.0003070692,0.001647907,0.0001532259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988254,0.000205096,0.0002327409,0.0001072375,0.0005654371,0.00006407129],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001893192,0.0002969057,0.01479993,0.001378388,0.00004699986,0.0003822957,0.0003836217,0.007631713,0.7815281,0.0131683,0.001800065,0.1783945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003281283,0.002292813,0.02903389,0.0002442226,0.0001365393,0.001321832,0.0006983184,0.0138407,0.8514932,0.02065426,0.08015368,0.00009772727],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3846664,0.01807011,0.5407438,0.00355003,0.0001703178,0.001955033,0.001757358,0.0009940967,0.04809282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7135448,0.01516528,0.2504713,0.0007547779,0.00008479608,0.0009189429,0.001256297,0.00006819511,0.01773548],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.995231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01857316,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01726050557861581,"score_gpt":0.2154359592790274,"score_spread":0.1981754537004116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}