{"id":"W2047654864","doi":"10.1016/j.jmacro.2009.06.004","title":"The response of Australian consumption to housing wealth","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Macroeconomics","topic":"Housing Market and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Cointegration; Economics; Wealth effect; Asset (computer security); Wealth elasticity of demand; National wealth; Autonomous consumption; Consumer spending; Financial asset; Labour economics; Estimation; Permanent income hypothesis; Monetary economics; Demographic economics; Econometrics; Macroeconomics; Finance; Market liquidity; Recession; Debt","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00344799,0.0001358601,0.0004919071,0.00028713,0.0001456935,0.0001199818,0.0003915893,0.00008730163,0.00006637653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002494961,0.0001332921,0.0002025421,0.00009108773,0.00006899466,0.0002497284,0.00003099553,0.0002045002,0.0001396997],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003053917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008470593,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001322888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002069724,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979753,0.00004115956,0.001493481,0.0001606962,0.00002719053,0.0003021464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977422,0.0002179372,0.001521669,0.0002919773,0.00006196117,0.0001642801],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0230127,0.0009193898,0.4050208,0.0001801552,0.0008180825,0.00007643563,0.006371002,0.02714876,0.003687206,0.2178166,0.05848151,0.2564673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003255886,0.001999419,0.3433858,0.0001499502,0.00004607491,0.0002002572,0.0006177156,0.001696647,0.002742242,0.0598359,0.5851898,0.0008802961],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.988608,0.0002334342,0.0005206423,0.007060883,0.0008623122,0.0001148688,0.00002355936,0.000007604243,0.002568704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956561,0.001132749,0.002185916,0.0004971235,0.0002025451,6.612578e-7,6.107899e-7,0.00001801497,0.0003063207],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5267083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5435494,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03633283982815514,"score_gpt":0.2670270414522762,"score_spread":0.230694201624121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}