{"id":"W2047654864","doi":"10.1016/j.jmacro.2009.06.004","title":"The response of Australian consumption to housing wealth","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Macroeconomics","topic":"Housing Market and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Cointegration; Economics; Wealth effect; Asset (computer security); Wealth elasticity of demand; National wealth; Autonomous consumption; Consumer spending; Financial asset; Labour economics; Estimation; Permanent income hypothesis; Monetary economics; Demographic economics; Econometrics; Macroeconomics; Finance; Market liquidity; Recession; Debt","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000978647,0.000175291,0.0003095681,0.0005556846,0.0007809541,0.001083475,0.0005699074,0.0009744843,0.005437382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01111257,0.0002844054,0.0004017881,0.001580823,0.0006622457,0.0006437733,0.001365278,0.001384187,0.0007192361],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002495012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008535059,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1925308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2168888,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995579,0.0001656602,0.00002322489,0.00004911264,0.0001052123,0.00009882884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957022,0.001433347,0.0009954466,0.0002535674,0.001110369,0.0005051146],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001243349,0.000408665,0.9458762,0.0001124334,0.0001919705,0.0006650555,0.008879245,0.005501591,0.003117644,0.005418219,0.007518589,0.02106715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000556681,0.00006264335,0.9932696,0.000009386009,0.00001934888,0.00003480225,0.0015605,0.002652752,0.0001756142,0.000449786,0.00175117,0.000008757479],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940228,0.000119507,0.0000927967,0.001254596,0.00001755243,0.000008616379,0.000251198,0.000005684519,0.004227244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958838,0.0001011484,0.00004325127,0.00013006,0.00001165775,0.000006928648,0.0001454622,0.000003968749,0.00367377],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1925308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3828202,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03633283982815514,"score_gpt":0.2670270414522762,"score_spread":0.230694201624121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}