{"id":"W2047672923","doi":"10.1073/pnas.0703333104","title":"Quantifying the biodiversity value of tropical primary, secondary, and plantation forests","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1172,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Toronto","funders":"Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council","keywords":"Biodiversity; Species richness; Deforestation (computer science); Taxon; Ecology; Secondary forest; Habitat; Tropics; Geography; Agroforestry; Old-growth forest; Abundance (ecology); Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001015508,0.00004221391,0.00007467493,0.00003863214,0.0002884188,0.000004791394,0.000280652,0.00004023043,0.00001171049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001488076,0.00002454213,0.00002587192,0.0002429612,0.001684756,0.0002200073,0.0001757202,0.00008593855,9.818449e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002297701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006009504,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001501731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007868897,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992005,0.000005101655,0.0001703972,0.0001118603,0.0004306113,0.00008149214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994949,0.0002106903,0.0002475857,0.000004034325,0.00003010058,0.00001270407],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001407765,0.00001544985,0.9587202,0.00002301553,0.000006792392,3.013362e-9,0.0005169745,0.00007604242,0.01468543,0.02549802,0.0001279106,0.0003160929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009403072,0.0000260096,0.9757252,0.000009191173,0.000007770653,0.00000301636,0.0002045158,0.0004867048,0.01173919,0.01165232,0.00002493266,0.00002712728],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9917157,0.00003631054,0.000008681426,0.001504237,0.00001214008,0.0000857134,0.00000565138,0.000002542315,0.006629072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989283,0.00002300215,0.0008380197,0.0001820594,0.000006988071,8.023525e-7,8.172689e-8,5.721592e-7,0.00002013932],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.017005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6207556,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03339885694400115,"score_gpt":0.2848312395414437,"score_spread":0.2514323825974426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}