{"id":"W2047677807","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2419.2007.00273.x","title":"Understanding frame‐of‐reference training success: a social learning theory perspective","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Training and Development","topic":"Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation","field":"Psychology","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Training (meteorology); Control (management); Relational frame theory; Frame (networking); Protocol (science); Psychology; Applied psychology; Learning theory; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Cognitive psychology; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003131495,0.0001201565,0.0002139453,0.0004454019,0.0001732318,0.00004450461,0.0002001097,0.00008735684,0.0004633979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001382755,0.000109854,0.00004782062,0.00008773373,0.00009515461,0.0001353448,0.0000317564,0.0003707329,0.000006305995],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002732695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002577288,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003854818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000730541,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984025,0.00008767628,0.0005972451,0.0001337122,0.0005660779,0.0002127902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986933,0.0003146387,0.0005240683,0.00002865608,0.000374183,0.00006510395],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005954063,0.00006561952,0.01968424,0.000007790362,0.0007115267,0.00005480257,0.7407208,0.00006551931,0.000152172,0.0658739,0.00008684736,0.1719814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002844,0.0002562485,0.347307,0.0003287962,0.0000414415,0.0002826687,0.6269985,0.00005840209,0.0002124798,0.008673864,0.01261562,0.0003808921],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8972506,0.0001594836,0.06516471,0.0001789139,0.0007354041,0.00005138429,0.000001096069,0.00001592036,0.0364425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960865,0.00001301164,0.003195321,0.00007724523,0.0002884761,0.000001573653,0.000005301479,0.00001132064,0.0003212403],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3276228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5073882,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2956799736893404,"score_gpt":0.4149554841590518,"score_spread":0.1192755104697114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}