{"id":"W2047679555","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.10.008","title":"Addressing the removal of rare species in multivariate bioassessments: The impact of methodological choices","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":174,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto; Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Ordination; Multivariate statistics; Multivariate analysis; Rare species; Ecology; Biology; Statistics; Habitat; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001467555,0.0001371679,0.0002971571,0.00005931051,0.0001818924,0.000006018829,0.0006009569,0.0001212302,0.007132581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006277533,0.00005750408,0.0001251116,0.0004594745,0.001562628,0.00009750644,0.0006724854,0.0002384735,0.00002556575],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007719507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008919462,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004686909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000408865,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983422,0.0006259839,0.0003579934,0.0002338597,0.0001614298,0.000278589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985141,0.0008945226,0.0003313495,0.0002231723,0.000005365908,0.00003149465],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005176292,0.0003847319,0.9951702,0.000004342831,0.00007662694,0.00002246496,0.0009749618,0.00009264487,0.0003245336,0.0009360609,0.001243338,0.0007183694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002098376,0.0002325092,0.9959328,0.00000588094,0.00001980777,0.000002875486,0.0007693931,0.00003668985,0.0003559163,0.001952542,0.0004094306,0.00007233171],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9321487,0.00003131411,0.00005614026,0.0002290509,0.0000695071,0.0003085007,0.000005220847,0.00001416683,0.06713738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978929,0.00004995837,0.001646003,0.0001627574,0.00001164184,0.0000326036,0.000001193549,0.000003904172,0.0001990389],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06693834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.993775,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2521586095370466,"score_gpt":0.386577674110558,"score_spread":0.1344190645735115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}