{"id":"W2047726441","doi":"10.1111/avsc.12061","title":"Effects of post‐windthrow salvage logging on microsites, plant composition and regeneration","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Vegetation Science","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Windthrow; Microsite; Salvage logging; Seed dispersal; Ecology; Regeneration (biology); Logging; Species diversity; Environmental science; Understory; Forest restoration; Forest floor; Moss; Canopy; Biological dispersal; Ecosystem; Forest ecology; Biology; Seedling; Agronomy; Population","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000475241,0.0001756136,0.0002355172,0.0003162216,0.0002326107,0.0003983703,0.0002388382,0.0001563749,0.001648918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008175164,0.00009503154,0.0002485533,0.0001814543,0.000319886,0.0001681954,0.0002043291,0.0001849102,0.0001192196],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007098578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000444738,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02978683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1482295,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997275,0.00007590033,0.00001601537,0.00005751308,0.00005204126,0.00007097652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998654,0.0003414308,0.0003370503,0.00006779938,0.0001490964,0.0004506966],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009195241,0.0001736676,0.9799255,0.00002151108,0.0001201054,0.0002097863,0.000106461,0.0004381039,0.0118285,0.00001733479,0.00009646887,0.00614303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.270581e-7,0.00009424459,0.9995605,0.000001116381,0.000005202137,0.00001245919,0.00003570301,0.0001441495,0.0001196194,0.000002905968,0.00002233092,7.875632e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997718,0.00003098905,0.0000205289,0.000003976136,7.141441e-7,0.000001647549,0.00006656264,0.000001841202,0.0001018899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996349,0.00001198515,0.00003113514,0.000006017224,8.654673e-7,0.000001887897,0.0001149213,0.000001064719,0.0001971739],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02978683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05922687,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00803519744083732,"score_gpt":0.1866881863757451,"score_spread":0.1786529889349077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}