{"id":"W2047743404","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.03.009","title":"An urban metabolism and ecological footprint assessment of Metro Vancouver","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Management","topic":"Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":172,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Ecological footprint; Metropolitan area; Material flow analysis; Urban metabolism; Sustainability; Carbon footprint; Environmental science; Resource (disambiguation); Geography; Urban planning; Environmental protection; Environmental resource management; Greenhouse gas; Ecology; Urban density","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007487238,0.0001642944,0.0003997719,0.00007989658,0.00008215795,0.00003302543,0.0003038682,0.0000673957,0.005776872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001185486,0.000116508,0.0001633954,0.0001161096,0.0002327987,0.0003244815,0.0003707969,0.0001494458,0.00002274906],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000398708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002594912,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007440792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003327914,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981557,0.0001601589,0.0006539664,0.0002547976,0.0005219081,0.0002534837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990545,0.00004832654,0.0004322491,0.0002451697,0.000006104307,0.0002136786],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002338894,0.001998378,0.96688,0.00003559405,0.0002852595,0.00004406982,0.0001162453,0.003467448,0.005332004,0.0005105472,0.001215639,0.02009142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004543214,0.0004685651,0.990493,0.000004310396,0.0001372275,0.000003084197,0.002824957,0.0006165777,0.000110803,0.0009665864,0.003790092,0.0001304924],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954337,0.0000622588,0.0006445664,0.0001050106,0.000112215,0.000336383,0.000001631986,0.000005160571,0.003299075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930708,0.00008462922,0.006351769,0.0001112215,0.00003454851,0.00001997632,6.298939e-7,0.000007644897,0.0003188068],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02361298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.995132,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00417373157586138,"score_gpt":0.2114141140431674,"score_spread":0.207240382467306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}