{"id":"W2047743404","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.03.009","title":"An urban metabolism and ecological footprint assessment of Metro Vancouver","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Management","topic":"Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":172,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Ecological footprint; Metropolitan area; Material flow analysis; Urban metabolism; Sustainability; Carbon footprint; Environmental science; Resource (disambiguation); Geography; Urban planning; Environmental protection; Environmental resource management; Greenhouse gas; Ecology; Urban density","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002029353,0.0002403122,0.000218505,0.001312028,0.001010675,0.001408936,0.0004683475,0.0003070511,0.001324458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006534212,0.0002250073,0.0002316422,0.002853343,0.0002478477,0.0002183022,0.0006298493,0.0001733698,0.0002252838],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003824329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001766373,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8247488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9476873,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998327,0.00002942043,0.000006043953,0.0000223755,0.00005846802,0.00005086319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997029,0.00003116941,0.00002884288,0.0000149715,0.0001595513,0.00006253891],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003437735,0.0001118365,0.9667974,0.00004604401,0.00009951398,0.0003924929,0.001073557,0.007488388,0.003020868,0.0004812553,0.0005273035,0.01961768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009190164,0.00005876549,0.9718602,0.00001485732,0.00004297797,0.0001301525,0.004050856,0.02075635,0.0006808126,0.0001308389,0.002250516,0.0000144983],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982147,0.00002892039,0.00008706383,0.000009562003,5.980591e-7,0.000009256602,0.0002771623,0.00000197078,0.001370749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983571,0.00004683357,0.000193193,0.00000335013,4.403212e-7,0.000004474141,0.0003050654,0.000002884874,0.001086646],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1752512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3525667,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00417373157586138,"score_gpt":0.2114141140431674,"score_spread":0.207240382467306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}