{"id":"W2047795191","doi":"10.1139/x09-139","title":"A meta-regression analysis of forest carbon offset costs","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Carbon sequestration; Carbon offset; Carbon sink; Environmental science; Taiga; Climate change; Forestry; Greenhouse gas; Kyoto Protocol; Boreal; Forest management; Fossil fuel; Natural resource economics; Agroforestry; Ecology; Geography; Economics; Carbon dioxide","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0548468,0.003858128,0.009868882,0.008124017,0.0005763859,0.003281655,0.002918083,0.00208871,0.005459681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09068499,0.001615034,0.05844753,0.00951097,0.0006830638,0.002119178,0.001553105,0.003480894,0.0006938352],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002143196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001677505,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007311556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006691919,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9474966,0.03926272,0.004718295,0.004441909,0.00342584,0.0006546813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8866349,0.09726433,0.006888471,0.006134556,0.002540336,0.0005373628],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004050845,0.0000279181,0.01383248,0.01180511,0.9555155,0.0002124455,0.00002808744,0.0055609,0.0002353653,0.0003722188,0.000871493,0.007487648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006454136,0.0003513594,0.007519732,0.0009791177,0.9832562,0.0002337808,0.0000313459,0.00446612,0.0003497869,0.0007682677,0.001366032,0.00003279863],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1363772,0.791214,0.04832257,0.002675587,0.001107082,0.001215348,0.01491007,0.0008792079,0.00329892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9062068,0.06689786,0.01820066,0.000701891,0.0003550561,0.00170856,0.00393816,0.0003253491,0.001665652],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0548468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2900611,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06897101427247866,"score_gpt":0.3384838270445816,"score_spread":0.269512812772103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}