{"id":"W2047795191","doi":"10.1139/x09-139","title":"A meta-regression analysis of forest carbon offset costs","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Carbon sequestration; Carbon offset; Carbon sink; Environmental science; Taiga; Climate change; Forestry; Greenhouse gas; Kyoto Protocol; Boreal; Forest management; Fossil fuel; Natural resource economics; Agroforestry; Ecology; Geography; Economics; Carbon dioxide","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002027203,0.0001553495,0.0004905267,0.001708571,0.0001724199,0.00006545032,0.0007497126,0.00008890452,0.002953555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002438322,0.0001079395,0.0003959646,0.00271731,0.0004040959,0.000213042,0.00005492635,0.0004084323,0.00006431419],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004829961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002572023,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07880088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4947225,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974832,0.0002143229,0.0004894654,0.0001863183,0.0009731293,0.0006535564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983053,0.0001203757,0.0002356824,0.0003827825,0.0001224607,0.0008334359],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004970765,0.0000477039,0.9443623,0.000006951022,0.001286817,0.0002068923,0.0003896313,0.00914417,0.0001148703,0.001414782,0.0385059,0.004470204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003109743,0.0004861357,0.970226,0.00003399854,0.001229416,0.00001214225,0.00004717489,0.002803553,0.00008805054,0.001327656,0.02329102,0.0001438975],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9560943,0.0003803711,0.000008199126,0.001933527,0.00005997993,0.0001515353,0.00001522355,0.000002845551,0.04135403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971201,0.00004673688,0.0001164202,0.000100989,0.00007471222,0.000002551131,0.000009734546,0.00000961696,0.002519098],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4159216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979579,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06897101427247866,"score_gpt":0.3384838270445816,"score_spread":0.269512812772103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}