{"id":"W2047856763","doi":"10.1049/iet-ipr.2012.0489","title":"Is there a relationship between peak‐signal‐to‐noise ratio and structural similarity index measure?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IET Image Processing","topic":"Image and Video Quality Assessment","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Measure (data warehouse); Similarity (geometry); Index (typography); Signal-to-noise ratio (imaging); Noise (video); SIGNAL (programming language); Similarity measure; Structural similarity; Pattern recognition (psychology); Mathematics; Statistics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Speech recognition; Data mining; Image (mathematics)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003030163,0.0006236156,0.001073825,0.003362176,0.0003295675,0.002047493,0.0009748515,0.002345925,0.002751314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04722022,0.0004269581,0.0004533609,0.002418742,0.001781059,0.005586197,0.0007059728,0.0009397818,0.002001333],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004517665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000360489,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004471295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000353538,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972854,0.000494588,0.0003016079,0.0008308634,0.0009188635,0.000168707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9612139,0.02712157,0.004919105,0.001344383,0.004846639,0.0005543266],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008644898,0.0007887996,0.180861,0.002208311,0.0008381911,0.001001376,0.001210389,0.02514422,0.06658897,0.06019007,0.007499623,0.6528046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001198703,0.004240022,0.4301396,0.001052118,0.0008385922,0.01161366,0.00432292,0.2863947,0.05706232,0.1742621,0.0290946,0.0008593884],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3025461,0.02510724,0.6425142,0.004020189,0.0006629335,0.0002328906,0.0005392886,0.0008527773,0.02352437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.940276,0.004538827,0.05117343,0.0005658391,0.0006512261,0.0001412079,0.0004754398,0.0001350483,0.002042982],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003362176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01602525,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05674422087945397,"score_gpt":0.3303436820595361,"score_spread":0.2735994611800821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}