{"id":"W2047891469","doi":"10.1103/physreve.70.016217","title":"Entanglement as a signature of quantum chaos","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physical Review E","topic":"Quantum chaos and dynamical systems","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":193,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Quantum entanglement; Quantum chaos; Lyapunov exponent; Chaotic; Physics; Squashed entanglement; Statistical physics; Quantum; Quantum mechanics; Bipartite graph; Signature (topology); Mathematics; Quantum dynamics; Nonlinear system; Computer science; Discrete mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001902808,0.0001280994,0.0002021474,0.0004664588,0.0003223507,0.0006756732,0.0001652478,0.0002171998,0.0006232157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007593452,0.0001015888,0.0001343912,0.0003561779,0.001545931,0.0009936355,0.0006121968,0.0003300234,0.0000461109],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002619989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001218723,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002360962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002312475,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999049,0.0000285671,0.000004369982,0.0000148598,0.00002804675,0.00001931635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996457,0.0001585548,0.00007356261,0.00006375439,0.00002956147,0.00002894142],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001400283,0.00004800496,0.01060133,0.0001276647,0.00005428419,0.001109751,0.00105933,0.06516524,0.1243267,0.7743019,0.0005745072,0.02249119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002293335,0.0001832939,0.01661391,0.00005318922,0.00004076681,0.0009125323,0.0004664176,0.3088155,0.03421566,0.6335925,0.005013099,0.00007016654],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9680957,0.0005774241,0.02220312,0.0002147191,0.00001365415,0.000006942854,0.0000233711,0.00003722402,0.008827838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979613,0.000146707,0.001604722,0.00001296813,0.000007309094,0.000003218899,0.000005542692,0.000004995448,0.000253429],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0006756732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.002084911,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009618101254334644,"score_gpt":0.2953806904254435,"score_spread":0.2857625891711089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}