{"id":"W2047891469","doi":"10.1103/physreve.70.016217","title":"Entanglement as a signature of quantum chaos","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physical Review E","topic":"Quantum chaos and dynamical systems","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":193,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Quantum entanglement; Quantum chaos; Lyapunov exponent; Chaotic; Physics; Squashed entanglement; Statistical physics; Quantum; Quantum mechanics; Bipartite graph; Signature (topology); Mathematics; Quantum dynamics; Nonlinear system; Computer science; Discrete mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008382707,0.0001496885,0.0004360493,0.00001234354,0.00003073508,0.000007787421,0.0001541842,0.00001431942,0.0002820183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000085228,0.0001080511,0.0002815865,0.0001615098,0.00003478532,0.00005235999,0.00004587092,0.0001324826,0.0002323538],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002127063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003739461,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002335404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.639126e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990515,0.0000323926,0.000274208,0.0001964002,0.0002457111,0.0001998609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994395,0.0000333675,0.0001430946,0.0002355411,0.00004620173,0.0001023315],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004140648,0.0004724798,0.0001550044,0.0005208958,0.0000480345,0.000001345146,0.00008720542,0.00002571654,0.003228839,0.9891813,0.0002858042,0.005989167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002105861,0.000732876,0.0007048717,0.009279255,0.0003378074,0.000002994919,0.0001936527,0.002500709,0.01218022,0.9104465,0.06055712,0.0009581065],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9289399,0.02218478,0.009448146,0.003341395,0.0004068149,0.002098558,0.0001529232,0.00008848678,0.03333896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990615,0.0002270861,0.00003154771,0.0002426898,0.0003088109,0.00005071679,0.00002568422,0.00001279027,0.000039203],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07873484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4406194,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009618101254334644,"score_gpt":0.2953806904254435,"score_spread":0.2857625891711089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}