{"id":"W2047996239","doi":"10.1108/09534810310502568","title":"Emancipatory potential of action learning:a critical analysis","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Organizational Change Management","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Instrumentalism; Sociology; Privilege (computing); Action (physics); Power (physics); Context (archaeology); Perspective (graphical); Action learning; Critical theory; Epistemology; Democracy; Political science; Law; Politics; Pedagogy; Computer science; Teaching method; Cooperative learning","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006029782,0.0001722663,0.0003353465,0.001134357,0.0002085528,0.00009621592,0.000217747,0.00004846241,0.002269217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003717682,0.0001614291,0.000174527,0.00246563,0.00006019066,0.0008242042,0.0001461052,0.0001230157,0.00005399095],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000601004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001294073,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007905526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008158421,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981887,0.0000342699,0.0005928371,0.0001775983,0.0008127464,0.0001938384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981216,0.00003905263,0.0006451581,0.0001134485,0.001059452,0.00002130086],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007535044,0.0006283894,0.2683078,0.0008464394,0.002945317,0.00008883768,0.0001623465,0.003853284,0.0002645409,0.7144806,0.007547966,0.0007990804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002806822,0.0001700172,0.760591,0.0001665792,0.01111863,0.00002549591,0.004724476,0.00280901,0.0006319742,0.03381795,0.1820498,0.001088285],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3582006,0.004573498,0.4835902,0.01013061,0.008842937,0.002020912,0.00001754542,0.0003855102,0.1322381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964479,0.000157754,0.001313072,0.0005349651,0.000972097,0.000004155894,0.00002342056,0.00002852206,0.0005180843],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6806627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986429,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03755873950231177,"score_gpt":0.263303836402591,"score_spread":0.2257450969002793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}