{"id":"W2048013836","doi":"10.1080/17513472.2010.501422","title":"Designing a human-scale cylindrical-mirror anamorphosis for an outdoor art installation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematics and the Arts","topic":"3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Observer (physics); Scale (ratio); Point (geometry); Constraint (computer-aided design); Computer science; Plane (geometry); RADIUS; Competition (biology); Architectural engineering; Engineering; Mathematics; Geometry; Physics; Geography; Computer security; Cartography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000867854,0.001233318,0.0004565515,0.0006181588,0.001480628,0.001412071,0.001627578,0.00121608,0.01091888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001557815,0.0007457049,0.0007930033,0.0003127422,0.001371753,0.001248614,0.001828381,0.0008607489,0.002560894],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005930759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001083799,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002648956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007505976,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991609,0.0001692595,0.00003481785,0.0002054954,0.0002989516,0.0001306553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993128,0.0001574046,0.00004220241,0.0002028468,0.0001300156,0.0001549041],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005799448,0.000791088,0.01016718,0.001000895,0.000105643,0.006129552,0.006282134,0.0779415,0.5950722,0.02406586,0.01055008,0.2673139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004163886,0.004594529,0.05328019,0.0003406645,0.000266844,0.01525731,0.009411936,0.4303204,0.1717245,0.01136446,0.3023289,0.0006939304],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2124564,0.0001190053,0.7490783,0.0004181223,0.0002156556,0.001122707,0.0002024746,0.002573923,0.03381349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4235993,0.00006378764,0.565296,0.00007080912,0.00002495352,0.0002168646,0.0001008246,0.0002861711,0.01034127],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01091888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03652734,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0943112760080724,"score_gpt":0.2624134954320084,"score_spread":0.168102219423936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}